2016
DOI: 10.3390/f7020043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Autoregressive Models for Stand Top and Stand Mean Height Relationship in Mixed Quercus mongolica Broadleaved Natural Stands of Northeast China

Abstract: Abstract:The relationship of stand top and stand mean height is important for forest growth and yield modeling, but it has not been explored for natural mixed forests. Observations of stand top and stand mean height can present spatial dependence or autocorrelation, which should be considered in modeling. Simultaneous autoregressive (SAR) models, including spatial lag model (SLM), spatial Durbin model (SDM) and spatial error model (SEM), within nine spatial weight matrices were utilized to model the stand top … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SLM is a formal representation of a spatial diffusion process which reflects the spatial dependence in the data and focuses on the assessment of the spatial dependence [32]. The SEM is developed based on the spatial autoregressive model with errors on the premise of no change for the explanatory variables [32,33], and it is assumed that the spatial autoregressive process occurs only in the error term, neither in the response variable nor in the predictor variables [64,97]. In short, although both the SEM and SLM models can explain the global spatial autocorrelation, they cannot deal with local spatial heterogeneity [33].…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLM is a formal representation of a spatial diffusion process which reflects the spatial dependence in the data and focuses on the assessment of the spatial dependence [32]. The SEM is developed based on the spatial autoregressive model with errors on the premise of no change for the explanatory variables [32,33], and it is assumed that the spatial autoregressive process occurs only in the error term, neither in the response variable nor in the predictor variables [64,97]. In short, although both the SEM and SLM models can explain the global spatial autocorrelation, they cannot deal with local spatial heterogeneity [33].…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied GWR and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to further analyze the relationship between the UBD and LST. The traditional regression model is based on the use of OLS to estimate the parameters and is usually compared as a benchmark model with an improved model [55][56][57]. OLS can be expressed as: We applied GWR and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to further analyze the relationship between the UBD and LST.…”
Section: Geographically Weighted Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that for estimating BAPP based on NFI data, H instead of stand dominant height was applied in the whole calculation. This is because (a) stand dominant height was not measured in Chinese NFI data, especially for multi-aged and mixed forests; and (b) the correlation between H and stand dominant height is strong [27].…”
Section: Computational Conditions For Bappmentioning
confidence: 99%