2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal variation in soil respiration in a Southeast Asian tropical rainforest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
145
8
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
18
145
8
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As we reviewed in the introduction, however, opposite results, whereby lower slopes had a lower soil respiration rate than upper slopes were reported in several forest ecosystems (e.g. Chambers et al 2004;Kosugi et al 2007). The discrepancy of these reports may result from the different characteristics of the study sites, such as vegetation-soil association, soil microbes, the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and soil water legumes on the slope.…”
Section: Discussion Spatial Variation In Soil Respiration Rate On Thementioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we reviewed in the introduction, however, opposite results, whereby lower slopes had a lower soil respiration rate than upper slopes were reported in several forest ecosystems (e.g. Chambers et al 2004;Kosugi et al 2007). The discrepancy of these reports may result from the different characteristics of the study sites, such as vegetation-soil association, soil microbes, the physical and chemical properties of the soil, and soil water legumes on the slope.…”
Section: Discussion Spatial Variation In Soil Respiration Rate On Thementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Shimada et al (1998) on the lower slope and 9.9 MgC ha À1 year À1 on the upper slope in a Japanese coniferous plantation. However, no correlation (Fang et al 2009), and the opposite trend, namely lower soil respiration rates on the lower slope and at the valley bottom than the upper slope (Chambers et al 2004;Tsutsumi et al 1985;Epron et al 2006;Mitani et al 2006;Kosugi et al 2007) have been reported in several forest ecosystems. Although many reports have suggested that soil respiration varies with slope position, no general principle concerning the relationship between slope position and soil respiration has yet been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the peak value in a ponderosa pine plantation in northern California was 6.03 lmol m À2 s À1 (Xu and Qi 2001), and it was 6.5 lmol m À2 s À1 in central Oregon (Law et al 1999). In a temperate mixed hardwood forest in Massachusetts, the peak value was 6.97 lmol m À2 s À1 (Davidson et al 1998), and it was 6.5 lmol m À2 s À1 in a Southeast Asian tropical rainforest (Kosugi et al 2007). Obviously, the peak values (15.61 lmol m À2 s À1 in 2006 and 17.72 lmol m À2 s À1 in 2007) in our study were far higher than those peaks in undisturbed ecosystems, which could not be explained by temperature and moisture alone (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kosugi et al (2007) demonstrated the complexity of soil respiration patterns, since spatial variability indicates CO 2 emissions are lower where the soil water content is higher; however, in terms of temporal variability, the opposite effect was found, as soil respiration was higher with increasing soil moisture. The mechanisms controlling the spatio-temporal variability of soil CO 2 efflux in water-limited ecosystems is highly complex (Leon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%