2006
DOI: 10.4005/jjfs.88.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Respiration Rate at a Small Watershed Revegetated with Japanese Cypress.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The closed times for the automated and manual chambers were 12 or 30 min; these times are relatively longer than those in other studies (e.g., Mitani et al;, Kosugi et al, 2007. However, we confirmed that the CO2 concentration in the chamber increased linearly until it was less than 1300 ppm, after which the rate of increase in CO2 concentration tended to decrease .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The closed times for the automated and manual chambers were 12 or 30 min; these times are relatively longer than those in other studies (e.g., Mitani et al;, Kosugi et al, 2007. However, we confirmed that the CO2 concentration in the chamber increased linearly until it was less than 1300 ppm, after which the rate of increase in CO2 concentration tended to decrease .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…While these areas have revegetated over the past 130 years, resulting in the current forest coverage, the forest soils are immature and contain very little organic carbon. Contrary to previous studies such as those by Jia et al (2003), Mitani et al (2006), and Kosugi et al (2007), Tamai et al (2005a) reported that soil respiration was lower in areas of higher topography due to drier soil in deciduous forests of the weathered granite region.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shimada et al (1998) on the lower slope and 9.9 MgC ha À1 year À1 on the upper slope in a Japanese coniferous plantation. However, no correlation (Fang et al 2009), and the opposite trend, namely lower soil respiration rates on the lower slope and at the valley bottom than the upper slope (Chambers et al 2004;Tsutsumi et al 1985;Epron et al 2006;Mitani et al 2006;Kosugi et al 2007) have been reported in several forest ecosystems. Although many reports have suggested that soil respiration varies with slope position, no general principle concerning the relationship between slope position and soil respiration has yet been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%