2000
DOI: 10.15760/etd.6010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and morphological change of Eliot Glacier, Mount Hood, Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If all protocols are identical, different investigators commonly define a glacier perimeter differently. For example, some investigators may include a small tributary ice patch while others may exclude it (e.g., Jackson and Fountain, 2007). Combining these two data sets without regard to understanding differing assumptions and techniques, particularly as sequential time series, leads to erroneous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all protocols are identical, different investigators commonly define a glacier perimeter differently. For example, some investigators may include a small tributary ice patch while others may exclude it (e.g., Jackson and Fountain, 2007). Combining these two data sets without regard to understanding differing assumptions and techniques, particularly as sequential time series, leads to erroneous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, subglacial cavitation and the formation of proglacial lakes (Frey and others, 2010) may further increase the rate of terminus retreat. One important feedback effect reducing glacier melt is the observed increasing debris coverage of an Alpine glacier tongue due to its retreat (Huss and others, 2007;Jackson and Fountain, 2007;Kellerer-Pirklbauer and others, 2008). Supraglacial debris is known to significantly reduce the melting of bare ice, due to its insulating properties (e.g.…”
Section: Influence Of Supraglacial Debris On Future Glacier Retreatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1901 and 2001, Eliot Glacier lost 775 m in length (Lillquist and Walker, 2006). Presently, Eliot Glacier is less than 1Ð6 km 2 , 3Ð6 km long, and 800 m at its greatest width (Jackson, 2007) (Figure 1). The glacier response observed in the Cascades is consistent with worldwide loss of mountain glaciers (Dyurgerov and Meier, 2000).…”
Section: Climate and Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 96%