The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-014-0408-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsity Constrained Graph Regularized NMF for Spectral Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data

Abstract: Hyperspectral images contain mixed pixels due to low spatial resolution of hyperspectral sensors. Mixed pixels are pixels containing more than one distinct material called endmembers. The presence percentages of endmembers in mixed pixels are called abundance fractions. Spectral unmixing problem refers to decomposing these pixels into a set of endmembers and abundance fractions. Due to nonnegativity constraint on abundance fractions, nonnegative matrix factorization methods (NMF) have been widely used for solv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there are mixed pixels present in a hyperspectral image due to the low spectral and spatial resolution. The mixed pixels contain more than one element, and so the spectral signature is not relevant; therefore, the accuracy of the classification will decrease [ 32 ]. The mixture models for a number of pixels is defined as where contains all the abundances of all pixels on all endmembers, is a spectrum matrix where each column corresponds to the spectrum of an endmember, is the number of observed bands, is the number of endmembers and corresponding abundances and is the additive noise [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are mixed pixels present in a hyperspectral image due to the low spectral and spatial resolution. The mixed pixels contain more than one element, and so the spectral signature is not relevant; therefore, the accuracy of the classification will decrease [ 32 ]. The mixture models for a number of pixels is defined as where contains all the abundances of all pixels on all endmembers, is a spectrum matrix where each column corresponds to the spectrum of an endmember, is the number of observed bands, is the number of endmembers and corresponding abundances and is the additive noise [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LMM is a popular model used in hyperspectral image unmixing, which assumes that the spectral response of a pixel is a linear combination of spectral signatures (called endmembers) [19,20,[30][31][32]. Given an observed spectrum vector of a mixed pixel y ∈ R l×1 , it can be approximated by a nonnegative linear combination of m endmembers, i.e.,…”
Section: Linear Mixture Model (Lmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) [21], [22] is another practical method of unmixing, which decomposes the data into two nonnegative matrices. Recently, this basic method was developed by adding some constraints, such as the minimum volume constrained NMF (MVC-NMF) method [2], graph regularized NMF (GNMF) [23] and manifold regularized sparse NMF (GLNMF) [24]. GLNMF is a two steps approach including sparse constraint and graph regularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%