?sparse? temporal sampling in auditory fMRI

Abstract

The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore central auditory function may be compromised by the intense bursts of stray acoustic noise produced by the scanner whenever the magnetic resonance signal is read out. We present results evaluating the use of one method to reduce the effect of the scanner noise: "sparse" temporal sampling. Using this technique, single volumes of brain images are acquired at the end of stimulus and baseline conditions. To optimize detection of the activation, images are taken near to the maxima and minima of the hemodynamic response during the experimental cycle. Thus, the effective auditory stimulus for the activation is not masked by the scanner noise. In experiment 1, the course of the hemodynamic response to auditory stimulation was mapped during continuous task performance. The mean peak of the response was at 10.5 sec after stimulus onset, with little further change until stimulus offset. In experiment 2, sparse imaging was used to acquire activation images. Despite the fewer samples with sparse imaging, this method successfully delimited broadly the same regions of activation as conventional continuous imaging. However, the mean percentage MR signal change within the region of interest was greater using sparse imaging. Auditory experiments that use continuous imaging methods may measure activation that is a result of an interaction between the stimulus and task factors (e.g., attentive effort) induced by the intense background noise. We suggest that sparse imaging is advantageous in auditory experiments as it ensures that the obtained activation depends on the stimulus alone.

Where sound position influences sound object representations: A 7-T fMRI study

“…To minimise the effect of the scanner noise associated with the high gradient switching rate necessary for EPI acquisition on the auditory stimulation, a sparse acquisition strategy was used (Hall et al, 1999;Zaehle et al, 2007); a long repetition time allowed the auditory stimulation and the scanner acoustic noise to be well separated in time. The acquisition was timed in such a way that the superior bank of the Sylvian fissure was sampled when the maximum BOLD signal was expected, i.e.…”

Unmixing concurrent EEG-fMRI with parallel independent component analysis

“…EPI volumes were aligned to the anterior-posterior comissura line and consisted of 18 axial slices with 5.5 mm thickness including 0.5 mm interslice gap, flip angle: 90°, excitation time: 60 ms, field of view: 220×220 mm, matrix: 64×64 voxels. A sparse-sampling acquisition protocol (Hall, et al, 1999) with 8 s repetition time and 2 s acquisition time was used. The protocol makes use of the hemodynamic lag between stimulus onset and BOLD peak and allowed for EEG-recording without interfering scanner noise and gradient artefacts during a 6s silent gap between successive volume acquisitions.…”

Narrative speech production: An fMRI study using continuous arterial spin labeling

“…This was achieved by asking participants to formulate a narrative consisting of an extended speech sample based on a large sequence of pictures illustrating a children's picture story. We circumvented potential problems associated with fMRI data collection during speech by using sparse data sampling, taking advantage of the delay in the hemodynamic response to collect cortical activation data following the cessation of speech (Belin et al, 1998;Hall et al, 1999). We also elected to use perfusion fMRI based on an arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion technique rather than Blood Oxygen-Level Dependent (BOLD) fMRI because ASL contrast does not depend on susceptibility effects, and ASL perfusion fMRI can be obtained using imaging sequences that minimize artifacts from static susceptibility gradients (FernandezSeara et al, 2005;Kemeny, Ye, Birn, & Braun, 2005;Kim et al, 2006).…”