2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Dynamic 3D Reconstruction from Unsynchronized Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along these lines, Avidan and Shashua [6] estimate dynamic geometry from 2D observations of points constrained to linear and conical motions. However, under the assumption of dense temporal motion sampling, the concept of motion smoothness has been successfully exploited [25,26,45,46,35,42,43,36,30,31]. Park et al [25] triangulate 3D point trajectories by the linear combination of Direct Cosine Transform trajectory bases with the constraint of a reprojection system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along these lines, Avidan and Shashua [6] estimate dynamic geometry from 2D observations of points constrained to linear and conical motions. However, under the assumption of dense temporal motion sampling, the concept of motion smoothness has been successfully exploited [25,26,45,46,35,42,43,36,30,31]. Park et al [25] triangulate 3D point trajectories by the linear combination of Direct Cosine Transform trajectory bases with the constraint of a reprojection system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valmadre et al [35] reduce the number of trajectory bases by setting a gain threshold depending on the basis null-space and propose a method using a highpass filter to mitigate low reconstructability for scenarios having no missing 2D observations. Zheng et al [43,42] propose a dictionary learning method to estimate the 3D shape with partial sequencing info, assuming 3D geometry estimates may be approximated by local barycentric interpolation (i.e. self-expressive motion prior) and developed a bi-convex framework for jointly estimating 3D geometry and barycentric weights.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conventional single view depth sequences and multiple view reconstruction of dynamic scenes techniques have been introduced to align sequences using correspondence information between frames. Methods have been proposed to obtain sparse [22,23,24,25] and dense [26,27,28] correspondence between consecutive frames for entire sequences. Existing sparse correspondence methods work independently on a frame-by-frame basis for a single view [25] or multiple views [23] and require a strong prior initialization [24].…”
Section: D Reconstruction Of Dynamic Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have been proposed to obtain sparse [16,17,14] and dense [15,18,13] correspondence between consecutive frames for entire sequence. Existing sparse correspondence methods work sequentially on a frame-to-frame basis for single view [14] or multi-view [16] and require a strong prior initialization [17]. Existing dense matching or scene flow methods [12,13] require a strong prior which fails in the case of large motion and moving cameras.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scene flow techniques [12,13] typically estimate the pairwise surface or volume correspondence between reconstructions at successive frames but do not extend to 4D alignment or correspondence across complete sequences due to drift and failure for rapid and complex motion. Existing feature matching techniques either work in 2D [14] or 3D [15] or for sparse [16,17] or dense [18] points. However these methods fail in the case of occlusion, large motions, background clutter, deformation, moving cameras and appearance of new parts of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%