2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D Match Trees for Non-rigid Surface Alignment

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a method for dense 4D temporal alignment of partial reconstructions of non-rigid surfaces observed from single or multiple moving cameras of complex scenes. 4D Match Trees are introduced for robust global alignment of non-rigid shape based on the similarity between images across sequences and views. Wide-timeframe sparse correspondence between arbitrary pairs of images is established using a segmentation-based feature detector (SFD) which is demonstrated to give improved matching … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various segmentation techniques like Watershed, Mean-Shift and SLIC used for proposed feature detection were explained. These Single-scale SFD features work well for wide-timeframe matching as shown in [51]. Although SFD depends on over-segmentation of the image it should be noted that increasing the segments to a denser level will lead to higher computational complexity and exponentially reduced matching accuracy.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Various segmentation techniques like Watershed, Mean-Shift and SLIC used for proposed feature detection were explained. These Single-scale SFD features work well for wide-timeframe matching as shown in [51]. Although SFD depends on over-segmentation of the image it should be noted that increasing the segments to a denser level will lead to higher computational complexity and exponentially reduced matching accuracy.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Qualitative evaluation: For comparative evaluation we use:(a) state-of-the-art dense flow algorithm Deepflow [35]; (b) dense flow without light-field consistency (DFwLF) in eq. 2; (c) a recent algorithm for alignment of partial surfaces (4DMatch) [11] and (d) Simple flow [34]. Qualitative results against DFwLF, 4DMatch, Deepflow and Simpleflow shown in Figure 12 indicate that the propagated colour map does not remain consistent across the sequence for large Figure 11.…”
Section: Results and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches assume a reconstruction of the full non-rigid object surface at each time frame and do not easily extend to 4D alignment of partial surface reconstructions or depth maps. Recent work obtained reliable temporal alignment of partial surfaces for complex dynamic scenes [11,12,13,14]. Dynamic Fusion [15] was introduced for 4D modelling from depth image sequences integrating temporal observations of non-rigid shape to resolve fine detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow from the joint estimation is evaluated against stateof-the-art methods: (a) Dense flow algorithms DCflow [57] and Deepflow [54]; (b) Scene flow methods PRSM [52]; and (c) Non-sequential alignment of partial surfaces 4DMatch [38] (requires a prior 3D mesh of the object as input for 4D reconstruction). The key-frames of sequence are coloured and the colour is propagated using dense flow from the joint optimisation throughout the sequence.…”
Section: Motion Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%