2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse coding of harmonic vocalization in monkey auditory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This general approach of a parsimonious representation of the sensory information is the main premise of this paper and this finding resonates with ideas of a canonical computation by the nervous system [ 23 , 74 , 93 – 98 ]. Specifically, sparse representation of information can explain neural activity in the visual cortex [ 24 , 34 , 95 , 99 ]; the olfactory system of insects [ 100 , 101 ]; and findings in the mammalian auditory cortex [ 102 105 ] (however, see [ 106 ]). Hopefully, this paper is one small step in searching for such a generalized theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general approach of a parsimonious representation of the sensory information is the main premise of this paper and this finding resonates with ideas of a canonical computation by the nervous system [ 23 , 74 , 93 – 98 ]. Specifically, sparse representation of information can explain neural activity in the visual cortex [ 24 , 34 , 95 , 99 ]; the olfactory system of insects [ 100 , 101 ]; and findings in the mammalian auditory cortex [ 102 105 ] (however, see [ 106 ]). Hopefully, this paper is one small step in searching for such a generalized theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model included a non-negativity constraint that encouraged sparseness. Sensory processing research has often connected neural representations with sparse codes (34)(35)(36)(37). The Hoyer sparseness measure, a normalized ratio of 𝓁 1 and 𝓁 2 norms, is often preferred, on the basis of criteria discussed in the literature ( 46)…”
Section: Evaluating the Sparseness Of The Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The encoding efficiency was also evaluated by measuring the sparseness of the activation weights h. The model included a non-negativity constraint that encouraged sparseness. Sensory processing research has often connected neural representations with sparse codes [187,188,189,190]. The Hoyer sparseness measure [191], a normalized ratio of 1 and 2 norms, is often preferred, based on criteria discussed in the literature [192],…”
Section: Encoding Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%