2019
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPARED Collaboration: Patient Selection for Partial Gland Ablation in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four patients with biopsy-proven MRI-visible GG1-2 PCa were treated with focal Cryoablation. The remaining patients with unilateral non-MRI-visible PCa underwent prostate hemiablation according to the SPARED guidelines [17]. In total, 76 cores were taken and analyzed using FCM (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four patients with biopsy-proven MRI-visible GG1-2 PCa were treated with focal Cryoablation. The remaining patients with unilateral non-MRI-visible PCa underwent prostate hemiablation according to the SPARED guidelines [17]. In total, 76 cores were taken and analyzed using FCM (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies must be prospective and protocol-driven in nature, with a clearly specified hypothesis and supported by robust power calculations and statistical analysis plans. Collaborative databases and online registries such as the Study of Prostate Ablation Related Energy Devices Coordinated Registry Network [49] and High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Evaluation and Assessment of Treatment Registry [50] provide a platform for sharing data and should be encouraged, although it has to be acknowledged that prospectively collected data from registries and databases are fundamentally retrospective in nature; such data are at best exploratory and should be used for hypothesis-generating rather than hypothesis-testing purposes. Consequently, careful attention must be paid to the study design.…”
Section: Implications For Clinical Practice and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some device areas, quality registries capturing more than 95% of procedures performed in USA provide a basis for such CRN lexicon 7 8. In other areas where no such infrastructure yet exists, the precompetitive, collaborative development of a minimum core data structure has been the successful focus of National Evaluation System for health Technology (NEST) Demonstration Programs (which provide proof of concept for scalable approaches to evidence generation across device types and across the total life cycle of a product) such as MDEpiNet’s RAPID (Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices),9 and CRNs such as WHT-CRN (Women’s Health Technology)6 10 and SPARED-CRN (The Study of Prostate Ablation Related Energy Devices) 11 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%