1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00178-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacer oligotyping of Mycobacterium bovis isolates compared to typing by restriction fragment length polymorphism using PGRS, DR and IS6110 probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous comparative studies, LM-PCR was found to be more discriminatory than spoligotyping (9, 16) and slightly less discriminatory than IS6110 RFLP (43,58). Also consistent with previous reports, both VNTR typing methods and first-and second-generation spoligotyping were more useful than IS6110 RFLP for discriminating strains containing few IS6110 copies (7,24,37,43,55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In agreement with previous comparative studies, LM-PCR was found to be more discriminatory than spoligotyping (9, 16) and slightly less discriminatory than IS6110 RFLP (43,58). Also consistent with previous reports, both VNTR typing methods and first-and second-generation spoligotyping were more useful than IS6110 RFLP for discriminating strains containing few IS6110 copies (7,24,37,43,55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this case, not only did SB0273 show the highest macroscopical median score, but this score even increased without the older animals (28.5). SB520 (17) and SB0153 (17) followed those values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…SB0520 has been described only in Argentina. 11 SB0145 has been described as the most extensively distributed genotype, found in Argentina, 9,10,12,13 Australia, 14 Brazil, 15 France, 5 Northern Ireland, 16,17 and other countries (as seen at http://www.mbovis.org).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spoligotyping is considered a very useful technique, at least at the level of a first screening (26,35), and the results are produced in an intrin-sically qualitative form, as the response for each spacer is either present or absent (15 The geographical distribution of the French isolates for which a spoligotype was obtained is represented in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%