34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacecraft charging - An update

Abstract: Twenty years after the landmark SCATHA program, spacecraft charging and its associated effects continue to be major issues for earth-orbiting spacecraft. Since the time of SCATHA, spacecraft charging investigations were focused primarily on surface effects and spacecraft external surface design issues. Today, however, a significant proportion of spacecraft anomalies are believed to be caused by internal charging effects (charging and ESD events internal to the spacecraft Faraday cage envelope). This review wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the differential charging of the largest surfaces relative to each other may take from seconds to hours [e.g., Koskinen et al , ]. Dielectric materials used in spacecraft have typical time constants of 10–10 5 s [ Garrett and Whittlesey , ]. The delay in the anomaly after Galaxy 15 exited eclipse favors internal charging, or deep dielectric charging, where charge accumulation over a period of time can induce an ESD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the differential charging of the largest surfaces relative to each other may take from seconds to hours [e.g., Koskinen et al , ]. Dielectric materials used in spacecraft have typical time constants of 10–10 5 s [ Garrett and Whittlesey , ]. The delay in the anomaly after Galaxy 15 exited eclipse favors internal charging, or deep dielectric charging, where charge accumulation over a period of time can induce an ESD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the sheath and wake effects for in‐situ measurements has been recognized early, and a number of studies were carried out to address this problem with increasingly more realistic models and simulations (Wang & Hastings, ; Scime et al, ; Torkar et al, ; Engwall et al, ; Svenes & Trøim, ; Garrett & Whittlesey, ; Anderson, ; Marchand et al, ; Miyake & Usui, ; Marchand & Lira, ; Capon et al, ). Due to the computational complexity, only recently, the effects of the magnetic field on the wake and spacecraft charging have been studied in self‐consistent simulations (Marchand, ; Darian et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 80–100 km mesospheric altitude range presents a different surface charging environment than the one present at satellite orbital altitudes, which have been extensively studied [ Garrett and Whittlesey , 2000; Hastings and Garrett , 1996]. One difference is manifested by the enormous amount of meteoric ablation that condenses into dust particles and is suspended in the Earth's mesosphere between 80 and 100 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%