2003
DOI: 10.1002/env.608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space–time modeling of vertical ozone profiles

Abstract: SUMMARYOzonesondes collect data relevant to ozone level at various altitudes. Modeling these data involves a combination of spatial and temporal modeling. The spatial component can be conveniently modeled as a four component mixture of normal distributions. The (relatively few) parameters of this mixture can then be modeled in a timedependent fashion, via a dynamic linear model. Computations are carried out via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kalman Filter uses past and current observations to predict the current states; an extension of this is the Kalman Smoother, which uses all available observations at all times to generate the posterior density given all observations p( θ t |y 1 :n ). Despite its simplicity, this formulation has many applications in real environmental problems [e.g., Lee and Berger , ; Kurtenbach et al ., ; Laine et al ., ]. However, all the strength of this methodology relies on the linear‐Gaussian properties that do not always hold, especially when extreme events are concerned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kalman Filter uses past and current observations to predict the current states; an extension of this is the Kalman Smoother, which uses all available observations at all times to generate the posterior density given all observations p( θ t |y 1 :n ). Despite its simplicity, this formulation has many applications in real environmental problems [e.g., Lee and Berger , ; Kurtenbach et al ., ; Laine et al ., ]. However, all the strength of this methodology relies on the linear‐Gaussian properties that do not always hold, especially when extreme events are concerned.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may then assign discriminatory SO 2 exposure to the different at-risk populations in the study region of a vast land-base. This could substantially improve on those methods in which measurements from a (few) centrally located stationary monitoring station(s) are used for the entire population (see examples in [21,26,30,42]). A primary concern of this latter approach is that it does not take into account the spatial and temporal variability of the air pollutants and the relationship of concentrations between the ambient environment of the monitoring stations and the specific personal breathing zone [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study that reviews the challenges and problems in trend analysis of climatic time series was published by Bates et al (2012), and a general trend analysis reference is Chandler and Scott (2011). For state space and functional analysis of atmospheric time series of similar type to that performed here, see Lee and Berger (2003) and Meiring (2007). This paper studies the feasibility and practical implementation of a state space approach for atmospheric time series analysis by defining a dynamic linear model (DLM) for stratospheric ozone time series.…”
Section: Laine Et Al: Time-varying Trends In Stratospheric Ozonementioning
confidence: 99%