2017
DOI: 10.1002/dac.3395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space‐time block coded spatial modulation with labeling diversity

Abstract: SummarySpace-time block coded spatial modulation (STBC-SM) exploits the advantages of both spatial modulation and the Alamouti space-time block code. Meanwhile, space-time labeling diversity has demonstrated an improved bit error rate (BER) performance in comparison to the latter. Hence, in this paper, we extend the application of labeling diversity to STBC-SM, which is termed STBC-SM-LD. Under identical channel assumptions, STBC-SM-LD exhibits superior BER performance compared to STBC-SM. For example, with 4 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the iterative decoding process results in added system complexity. Motivated by the need to overcome these disadvantages, Xu et al investigated a labeling diversity system that does not require bit‐interleaving or coding . They proposed an uncoded space‐time labeling diversity (USTLD) system, which they argued is far less complex and thus more energy efficient than the systems in previous studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the iterative decoding process results in added system complexity. Motivated by the need to overcome these disadvantages, Xu et al investigated a labeling diversity system that does not require bit‐interleaving or coding . They proposed an uncoded space‐time labeling diversity (USTLD) system, which they argued is far less complex and thus more energy efficient than the systems in previous studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the Rayleigh frequency‐flat fading channel is fully known at the receiver. For simulation purposes, the fading channel and noise parameters are defined in line with those presented in Section 2.3, while labeling maps for TC‐STLD are as illustrated in Govindasamy et al We evaluate the ABEP defined in to assess the tightness between analytical and simulation results. For comparison purposes, results of the STLD proposed by Xu et al are also included.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational complexity of the conventional STLD ML detector has been formulated in the previous work and is expressed as σnormalSnormalTnormalLnormalDnormal−normalMnormalL=NRfalse(10M2+4false)2M2. …”
Section: Comparison Of Computational Complexity Of the Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML receiver computational complexity of SM, GSM, F‐GSM, DSM, QSM, GQSM, and F‐QSM is given by double-struckCSM=8NRx2γ, double-struckCGSM=8NRx2γ, double-struckCF‐GSM=8NRx2γ, double-struckCDSM=12NRx2γ, double-struckCQSM=8NRx2γ, double-struckCGQSM=8NRx2γ, double-struckCF‐QSM=8NRx2γ. …”
Section: Analysis Of the Receiver Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist a spectral efficient variant of GSM termed as multiple active spatial modulation (MA‐SM), where each active antenna transmits a different modulation symbol to further increase the spectral efficiency. However, detection of antenna indices and symbols becomes more difficult due to the transmission of multiple symbols and presence of ICI . Space time block coded ‐ spatial modulation (STBC‐SM) is proposed, where GSM scheme with only two active transmit antennas is combined with Alamouti space time block code (STBC) to enhance the ABER performance via trnamsit diversity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%