2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2011.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space Shuttle drops down the SAA doses on ISS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further on, the local shielding for detectors positioned inside the station changes due to the rotation of the ISS (as mentioned Columbus goes from forward right to backward left) (Drobyshev & Benghin 2011). The mass of the shuttle (around 78 tons) increases the local shielding for detectors close to the shuttle (Dachev et al 2011), which is also the case for the DOSTEL instruments in Columbus. Figure 11 provides the absorbed dose rates for the SAA measured by the DOSTEL-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Iss Attitude Influence On the Absorbed Dose Rate -The Shuttlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further on, the local shielding for detectors positioned inside the station changes due to the rotation of the ISS (as mentioned Columbus goes from forward right to backward left) (Drobyshev & Benghin 2011). The mass of the shuttle (around 78 tons) increases the local shielding for detectors close to the shuttle (Dachev et al 2011), which is also the case for the DOSTEL instruments in Columbus. Figure 11 provides the absorbed dose rates for the SAA measured by the DOSTEL-1 (Fig.…”
Section: Iss Attitude Influence On the Absorbed Dose Rate -The Shuttlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4 is that during the five space shuttle docking times the SAA maximal doses fall by 600 lGy h -1 and reach an average level of 400-500 lGy h -1 for the STS-123 and STS-124 missions. For STS-126, STS-119, and STS-127, the drop was also 600 lGy h -1 from an average level of 1400 lGy h -1 (Dachev et al, 2011a). The analysis of the daily average SAA dose rate for the studied period shows that before 21 June 2008 it was around 300 lGy d .…”
Section: Saa Daily Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An instrumental solution was proposed in Dachev et al (2011e), where the possible hardware and software improvements for a new Liulin type dosimeter were outlined. New instruments will be able, on the basis of the analysis of the shape of the deposited energy spectrum and the value of the dose to flux ratio, to distinguish among the different types of radiation sources in the ISS radiation environment: GCR, IRB protons and outer radiation belt electrons.…”
Section: R3dr Instrument Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%