2006
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soziodemografische Unterschiede in der Teilnahme an Krebsfrüherkennungsuntersuchungen (KFU) in Deutschland - Eine Übersicht

Abstract: In 1971 a statutory programme aiming at the early detection of cancer was established in Germany. Since then, acceptance has been low, especially among men. In 2002, 49 % of the women, but only 20 % of the men entitled to screening, took part in the free preventive medical screening. This paper gives an overview of the research done in Germany between 1973 and 2003, examining the associations of sociodemographic factors with participation in cancer screening. All studies show that participation rates increase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of people reporting to have had skin cancer screening in both Austria and the US was somewhat lower than the participation proportion achieved in the 1-year SCREEN project (Haidinger et al , 2009; Lakhani et al , 2009). As known from other cancer early-detection programmes, some population groups (e.g., women, high socio-economic status, and urban dwellers) are more responsive to such programmes than others (Scheffer et al , 2006; von Wagner et al , 2009; Palencia et al , 2010; Sprague et al , 2010). Likewise in SCREEN, women show a substantially higher participation compared with men (Haidinger et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of people reporting to have had skin cancer screening in both Austria and the US was somewhat lower than the participation proportion achieved in the 1-year SCREEN project (Haidinger et al , 2009; Lakhani et al , 2009). As known from other cancer early-detection programmes, some population groups (e.g., women, high socio-economic status, and urban dwellers) are more responsive to such programmes than others (Scheffer et al , 2006; von Wagner et al , 2009; Palencia et al , 2010; Sprague et al , 2010). Likewise in SCREEN, women show a substantially higher participation compared with men (Haidinger et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS may be used to quantify the excess mortality due to melanoma. 14,15 Additionally to overall sex-specific 5-year RS, estimates by age group (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75+ years), by histology, by T-category, by N-category, by M-category and by body site are presented. 11 Expected survival was based on life tables stratified by age and sex (and by federal state for the regional comparison), using the Ederer II method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allerdings wird weiterhin nur ein Teil der Bevölkerung erreicht. Alter, Geschlecht, Bildungsniveau/sozioökonomischer Status, Partnerschaft, Kinder, Gesundheitszustand und Inanspruchnahme der hausärztlichen Versorgung [7,8,9,10] …”
Section: Hintergrund Und Fragestellungunclassified