2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOX, corporate transparency, and the cost of debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that our results add to the understanding of a specific benefit of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act. Like Carter () and Andrade et al (), we found a positive effect of SOX on terms of credit. Our model shows that the effect of SOX comes from a reduction in the information asymmetry between borrowers and lenders, mainly through three channels: disclosure, monitoring, and manager punishment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that our results add to the understanding of a specific benefit of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act. Like Carter () and Andrade et al (), we found a positive effect of SOX on terms of credit. Our model shows that the effect of SOX comes from a reduction in the information asymmetry between borrowers and lenders, mainly through three channels: disclosure, monitoring, and manager punishment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our paper is closely related to Andrade et al (2014) and Carter (2013). In this study, we contribute to the literature by analyzing the existence of a specific benefit of SOX, isolated from other contemporaneous events, on the terms of debt finance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, information access and transparency have the ability to decrease the cost of debt (Lu, Chen, and Liao 2010;Andrade, Bernile, and Hood 2014) and the cost of equity (Bhattacharya, Daouk, and Welker 2003;Barth, Konchitchki, and Landsman 2013). On the one hand, the corporation does benefit from disseminating more information to the market to reduce the cost of capital.…”
Section: Information Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the corporation does benefit from disseminating more information to the market to reduce the cost of capital. Indeed, information access and transparency have the ability to decrease the cost of debt (Lu, Chen, and Liao 2010;Andrade, Bernile, and Hood 2014) and the cost of equity (Bhattacharya, Daouk, and Welker 2003;Barth, Konchitchki, and Landsman 2013). On the other hand, given management's incentive to hide negative information for career concerns, there are reasons to obfuscate and keep information hidden.…”
Section: Information Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%