1971
DOI: 10.1109/t-c.1971.223136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet Progress in the Design of Fault-Tolerant Digital Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will turn out that this problem alone is difficult enough for an entire report. The first attempt at such an algorithm, based on results by R. D. Eldrid [10] and [16], [26], Some specific extensions of Roth's work include: structural factors in fault diagnosis [1], [2], [23], multiple fault diagnosis [3], [5], [7], [9], sequential circuit testing [21], fault location and coverage [6], [14], [31], and more general circuit and fault models [4], [10], [17], Recent work has tended to be in the areas of design for reliability and testability [1], [8], [12], [13], [30], and tests for specific types of circuits [11], [12], [18] "If the fault is present, then the first input will be 1 and the second input will be 0, so that the output is 1. If the fault is not present, then the first input will be 0 and the second input will be 0 so the output will be 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will turn out that this problem alone is difficult enough for an entire report. The first attempt at such an algorithm, based on results by R. D. Eldrid [10] and [16], [26], Some specific extensions of Roth's work include: structural factors in fault diagnosis [1], [2], [23], multiple fault diagnosis [3], [5], [7], [9], sequential circuit testing [21], fault location and coverage [6], [14], [31], and more general circuit and fault models [4], [10], [17], Recent work has tended to be in the areas of design for reliability and testability [1], [8], [12], [13], [30], and tests for specific types of circuits [11], [12], [18] "If the fault is present, then the first input will be 1 and the second input will be 0, so that the output is 1. If the fault is not present, then the first input will be 0 and the second input will be 0 so the output will be 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%