2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcec.2001.1707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations in Transition Economies: The Case of Poland and Hungary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(35 reference statements)
7
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we conclude that the countries have experienced uncommon money and price shocks that were driven by different types of supply and demand shocks. Dibooglu and Kutan (2001) report similar results for real exchange rates in transition economies. meeting in Copenhagen in December 2002, it was decided that, along with the frontrunners, Slovakia, Latvia and Lithuania would also join the EU on May 1, 2004.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Hence, we conclude that the countries have experienced uncommon money and price shocks that were driven by different types of supply and demand shocks. Dibooglu and Kutan (2001) report similar results for real exchange rates in transition economies. meeting in Copenhagen in December 2002, it was decided that, along with the frontrunners, Slovakia, Latvia and Lithuania would also join the EU on May 1, 2004.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Another difference between Korhonen (2003) and this paper is that we test the GCP restriction and use it to justify the variance decomposition. The difference between our study and the work of Fidrmuc and Korhonen (2003) and Dibooglu and Kutan (2001) is that these authors rely on the Blanchard-Quah identification that is stronger than the GCP restriction and the orthogonalization that we use. The Blanchard-Quah identification has been criticized in the literature (see Faust 3 In an early study, Boone and Maurel (1999) find that sizable fraction of the variation in unemployment in transition economies is explained by external factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We take 1000 draws from the posterior distribution, after having imposed the GCP restriction; see the third Appendix for details. 9 For each draw, we compute impulse responses and forecast error variance decomposition of y 1 (t). This yields 1000 draws from the posterior distribution of impulse responses and forecast error variance decomposition.…”
Section: Inference Methodology Having Found Support For the Gcp Hypomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is also widely applied in many previous researches (Clarida and Gali, 1994;Enders and Lee, 1997;Chen and Wu, 1997;Dibooglu and Kutan, 2001;Wang, 2005;Kakinaka, Miyamoto and Ok, 2010). Below, we have the biavariate moving-average (BMA) system as follows:…”
Section: Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 97%