2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal and real stochastic convergence of transition economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (1) is used to run a panel unit root test. In agreement with the existing research, the convergence rate is calculated as (Kutan and Yigit, 2004). …”
Section: The Methodologysupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equation (1) is used to run a panel unit root test. In agreement with the existing research, the convergence rate is calculated as (Kutan and Yigit, 2004). …”
Section: The Methodologysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…One key assumption underlying the LLC test is that countries share a common rate of convergence toward long run equilibrium. By contrast, Kutan and Yigit (2004) allow for disparities in the transition countries' paths to their steady states. By using the IPS test, they identify a lower degree of monetary convergence.1 This study allows all countries in the group to have different average speeds of adjustment to steady state equilibrium for all variables.…”
Section: The Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kočenda (2001), Yigit (2004, 2005), and Brada et al (2005) study not only nominal level convergence, but also real convergence. While Kočenda (2001) reports considerable real and monetary convergence, Kutan and Yigit (2004) find less convergence than Kočenda does. Kutan and Yigit (2005) observe that price and monetary convergence of the new EU members to the core EU standards is quite idiosyncratic.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ukraine falls into a category of transition countries and therefore the analysis of papers on transition economies is more closely related to our research. Kocenda (2001) and Kutan and Yigit (2004) papers found between and interregional convergence within Central and Eastern European (CEE) economies in terms of growth rates of real output. In particular, Baltic States do converge with the highest degree in all macroeconomic fundamentals.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%