2019
DOI: 10.14393/bj-v35n1a2019-41443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of potassium in the fertilization of Agata potato

Abstract: The potato plant presents extraordinary productive capacity, being the fertilization one of the essential factors to optimize the cultivars potential. Potassium (K), the nutrient most absorbed and transported by the crop, interferes with the productivity and tubers quality. Despite many efforts to improve the general and nutritional management of the crop, information as K source and its parceling are still not well elucidated, generating doubts to the producers regarding the decision making. The aim of this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the crop response to K 2 O, potassium sulfate should not be entirely supplied post planting before the sweet potatoes start to form an adequate leaf area. Similar results were obtained by Oliveira et al (2019), when studying the effect of potassium ns, *, **: not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05 and at p ≤ 0.01 by F test; CV: coefficient of variation; DF: degree of freedom Table 2. Summary of the analysis of variance for plant fresh mass (PFM), leaf dry mass (LDM), K leaf concentration (KLC), marketable root mass (MRM), number of marketable roots per plant (NMRP), production of marketable roots per plant (MRPP), total yield (TY) and marketable yield (MY) of sweet potato roots, in response to K 2 O sources and application splitting Table 3.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Given the crop response to K 2 O, potassium sulfate should not be entirely supplied post planting before the sweet potatoes start to form an adequate leaf area. Similar results were obtained by Oliveira et al (2019), when studying the effect of potassium ns, *, **: not significant, significant at p ≤ 0.05 and at p ≤ 0.01 by F test; CV: coefficient of variation; DF: degree of freedom Table 2. Summary of the analysis of variance for plant fresh mass (PFM), leaf dry mass (LDM), K leaf concentration (KLC), marketable root mass (MRM), number of marketable roots per plant (NMRP), production of marketable roots per plant (MRPP), total yield (TY) and marketable yield (MY) of sweet potato roots, in response to K 2 O sources and application splitting Table 3.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%