2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Controversy Surrounding Latitudinal Patterns in Herbivory and Defense

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
235
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
7
235
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the importance of quantifying geographical gradients in plant defence (and any other adaptation) over broad gradients, and supports the idea that the mixed findings of previous studies might be attributable to their limited sampling scale (Anstett et al, 2016;. However, we would have found the opposite trend if we had only sampled below 2,400 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This highlights the importance of quantifying geographical gradients in plant defence (and any other adaptation) over broad gradients, and supports the idea that the mixed findings of previous studies might be attributable to their limited sampling scale (Anstett et al, 2016;. However, we would have found the opposite trend if we had only sampled below 2,400 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Anstett, Nunes, Baskett, & Kotanen, 2016;Moles & Ollerton, 2016). Anstett, Nunes, Baskett, & Kotanen, 2016;Moles & Ollerton, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Recent work simultaneously addressing intra-and interspecific elevational gradients have reported that patterns may change depending on the level of organization studied (see Anstett et al 2016 for latitudinal gradients). For example, Descombes et al (2017) reported an overall increase in plant palatability with elevation based on plant communityweighted trait means, but at the individual species level, there was no effect of elevation on plant palatability in most cases.…”
Section: Addressing Both Within-and Among-species Variation In Plant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that future studies should focus on the intraspecific level or a narrow phylogenetic scale (e.g., a plant genus). The ultimate purpose of these hypotheses is to explain the strong variation in herbivory among different species (Coley et al 1985, Lim et al 2015, Anstett et al 2016, Hahn and Maron 2016, Zhang et al 2016. First, the main theoretical hypotheses about plant defense (e.g., the resource availability hypothesis, the plant apparency hypothesis, and the latitudinal herbivory-defense hypothesis) are community level, but not intraspecific-or clade-level hypotheses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%