2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source specificity and atmospheric processing of airborne PAHs: Implications for source apportionment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
199
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
199
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the use of diagnostic ratios has been criticized by a variety of authors and notwithstanding the known uncertainties, it was used in this paper only as an indicative way to give insight about sources (Katsoyiannis et al, 2007;Galerneau, 2008;Katsoyiannis et al, 2011;Katsoyiannis and Breivik, 2014).…”
Section: Diagnostic Ratio Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of diagnostic ratios has been criticized by a variety of authors and notwithstanding the known uncertainties, it was used in this paper only as an indicative way to give insight about sources (Katsoyiannis et al, 2007;Galerneau, 2008;Katsoyiannis et al, 2011;Katsoyiannis and Breivik, 2014).…”
Section: Diagnostic Ratio Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some limitations and weakness of PAHs source identification using these tools have been pointed out recently (Galarneau 2008;Dvorská et al 2011;Katsoyiannis et al 2011). The validity of such methods is based on two main assumptions: source specificity and species conservation (Galarneau 2008).…”
Section: Source Identification (Factor Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some limitations and weakness of PAHs source identification using these tools have been pointed out recently (Galarneau 2008;Dvorská et al 2011;Katsoyiannis et al 2011). The validity of such methods is based on two main assumptions: source specificity and species conservation (Galarneau 2008). In this study, the results have been critically interpreted in view of these assumptions: (1) Only particle-phase PAHs have been considered to minimize the differences in gasparticle phase distributions and chemical and photolytic reactivities; (2) as high temperature and solar radiation favor the volatilization and oxidation of PAHs, summer samples were not considered; the other three seasons are characterized by relatively low temperature (average <15°C); (3) a preliminary data analysis including diagnostic ratios, micrometeorology, emission inventory, and gaseous pollutants has been performed to help the interpretation of the most probable sources.…”
Section: Source Identification (Factor Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it indicates that biomass and coal combustion are important sources for PAHs in this city. Galarneau (2008) indicated that Flu/(Flu + Pyr) value is 0.57 for coal combustion. It can be concluded that for site HJQ, with few human activities and industries, the sources for PAHs are more simple than those for other sites, and coal combustion may be dominated.…”
Section: Diagnostic Ratio Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%