Source of Water and Potential Sanitizers and Biological Antimicrobials for Alternative Poultry Processing Food Safety Applications

Micciche, Andrew C.; Rubinelli, Peter M.; Ricke, Steven C.

doi:10.3389/fsufs.2018.00082

Cited by 15 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 170 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further processing and packaging may occur which depends on the desired product (Sofos et al, 2013). However, alternatives exist to these centralized facilities, such as MPPU (Micciche et al, 2018a).…”

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, due to limitations on the number of birds processed without the need for inspection small scale MPPUs are also desirable (New Entry Sustainable Farming Project, 2012;Van Loo et al, 2013). Mobile poultry processing units have been extensively reviewed by O'Bryan et al 2014and Micciche et al (2018a) and only a limited discussion will be provided in the current review. Mobile poultry processing units are typically 5-11 m long and can be transported on trailers.…”

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, despite state regulations, wastewaters from MPPUs have been applied to gardens as fertilizer or discharged onto private property (Fanatico, 2003;Hoppe, 2010;O'Bryan et al, 2014). This may be a concern if pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes, are present in the processing water and if dumped near the farm it has the potential to be reintroduced into successive flocks (O'Bryan et al, 2014;Micciche et al, 2018a).…”

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Non-conventional poultry processing represents additional challenges due to restrictions on the types of antimicrobials that can be added. These restrictions can occur due to cost, the use of organic labeling, and transportability in the case of MPPUs (Fanatico, 2003;Micciche et al, 2018a;National Organic Program, 2018). General sanitation options typically include chemical sanitizers such as chlorine, PAA, or ozone, which may be used in organic processing (Northcutt and Jones, 2004;Mahapatra et al, 2005;O'Bryan et al, 2014).…”

Section: Potential Control Measures For Listeria In Poultry Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, the pasture-raised or free-range poultry industry continues to expand into the market place and in turn, presents a new set of challenges for food safety (Van Loo et al, 2012). Some of these flocks may be processed using a mobile poultry processing unit (MPPU) (Trimble et al, 2013;O'Bryan et al, 2014;Micciche et al, 2018a). Other alternative small scale processing facilities are available but due to the paucity of pathogen control information will not be discussed further (Fanatico, 2003;Ahuja and Sen, 2007;Trimble et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Listeria Occurrence and Potential Control Strategies in Alternative and Conventional Poultry Processing and Retail

Rothrock

Micciche

Bodie

et al. 2019

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Listeria monocytogenes is a psychrotrophic Gram positive organism that is considered one of the more critical foodborne pathogens of public health concern. To prevent illness the USDA and FDA enforce a zero-tolerance policy for Listeria on ready-to-eat foods such as delicatessen meats and poultry. Regardless, L. monocytogenes can still be isolated from food production facilities and retail products, indicating that current sanitation methods are not always sufficient. Both conventional and alternative poultry production and processing systems have also been identified as potential sources of Listeria spp. Concerns associated with alternative poultry production and processing can be further exacerbated by limitations on sanitation and available antimicrobials for usage in organic and natural poultry products. Furthermore, mobile poultry processing units often process organic and small-scale poultry farms that are not able to be processed by conventional standing facilities. These alternative production facilities and their products are often exempt from federal inspection, due to processing a relatively low number of carcasses. Due to these exemptions, it is unknown if sufficient sanitation is applied in these alternative processing facilities to prevent L. monocytogenes contamination. Organic processing restrictions may also impact which sanitizers and antimicrobials can be utilized. This review describes variations between conventional and mobile poultry processing units in conjunction with how L. monocytogenes may persist in the processing environment and on retail products. This review will also examine alternative antimicrobials proven to be effective against Listeria spp. and potentially be acceptable for use in alternative poultry production systems.

show abstract

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Potential Control Measures For Listeria In Poultry Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Listeria Occurrence and Potential Control Strategies in Alternative and Conventional Poultry Processing and Retail

Rothrock

Micciche

Bodie

et al. 2019

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Controlling microbial population in livestock and poultry industry using electrolyzed water as an emerging technology for ensuring food safety

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems

Ricke

Rothrock

2020

Poultry Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alternative poultry production systems consisting of free-range or pasture flock raised poultry continues to increase in popularity. Based on the perceived benefits of poultry products generated from these alternative poultry production systems, they have commercial appeal to consumers. Several factors impact the health and well being of birds raised and maintained in these types of production systems. Exposure to foodborne pathogens and potential for colonization in the gastrointestinal tract has to be considered with these types of production systems. The gastrointestinal tract microbial composition and function of birds grown and maintained in alternative poultry operations may differ depending on diets, breed, and age of bird. Dietary variety and foraging behavior are potential influential factors on bird nutrition. The gastrointestinal tract microbiomes of birds raised under alternative poultry production systems are now being characterized with next-generation sequencing to identify individual microbial members and assess the impact of different factors on the diversity of microbial populations. In this review, the gastrointestinal tract microbiota contributions to free-range or pasture-raised broiler and egg layer production systems, subsequent applications, and potential future directions will be discussed.

show abstract

Source of Water and Potential Sanitizers and Biological Antimicrobials for Alternative Poultry Processing Food Safety Applications

Cited by 15 publications

References 170 publications

Listeria Occurrence and Potential Control Strategies in Alternative and Conventional Poultry Processing and Retail

Listeria Occurrence and Potential Control Strategies in Alternative and Conventional Poultry Processing and Retail

Controlling microbial population in livestock and poultry industry using electrolyzed water as an emerging technology for ensuring food safety

Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About