2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source identification and global implications of black carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we observed variability in the slope of the linear fit line across the MA300 units (0.73-1.01), highlighting the presence of unit-to-unit variability. The range of slopes estimated from this study is consistent with other reported slopes from MA-series instruments when compared against a reference monitor ( Kuula et al, 2020;Alas et al, 2020;Blanco-Donado et al, 2022). To assess the unit-to-unit variability of MA300s, we adapt the methodology from Müller et al (2011a), where instruments of the same make and type were evaluated against a reference instrument.…”
Section: Unit-to-unit Variability Of Ma300 Reported Ebcsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, we observed variability in the slope of the linear fit line across the MA300 units (0.73-1.01), highlighting the presence of unit-to-unit variability. The range of slopes estimated from this study is consistent with other reported slopes from MA-series instruments when compared against a reference monitor ( Kuula et al, 2020;Alas et al, 2020;Blanco-Donado et al, 2022). To assess the unit-to-unit variability of MA300s, we adapt the methodology from Müller et al (2011a), where instruments of the same make and type were evaluated against a reference instrument.…”
Section: Unit-to-unit Variability Of Ma300 Reported Ebcsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…BC was observed to have the largest effect estimates on mortality per 1 μg/m 3 change in exposure, although a 1 μg/m 3 increase is a much larger relative increase for BC than other components studied (e.g., OM and sulfate) as shown in Table . BC emissions mainly come from incomplete combustion of biomass and fossil fuel and traffic emission . We observed larger effect sizes using Exposure II data compared to Exposure I (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…BC emissions mainly come from incomplete combustion of biomass and fossil fuel and traffic emission. 33 We observed larger effect sizes using Exposure II data compared to Exposure I ( Figure 2 ). This discrepancy in the effect size for BC may be explained, in part, by the discrepancy in BC concentrations of the two exposure sets that relied on monitored data from different sources (i.e., thermal method vs optical method).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The eBC/elemental carbon (EC) ratios were 2.8 for eBC AE33 /EC, 2.2 ± 0.2 for eBC AE51 /EC. No comparison of AE33 and MA200 were possible; however, a recent instrument comparison showed a 9% lower eBC yield for MA200 compared to AE33 (Blanco-Donado et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%