2003
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/13.5.486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Analysis of Event-related Cortical Activity during Visuo-spatial Attention

Abstract: Recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs) were combined with structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the spatio-temporal patterns of cortical activity that underlie visual-spatial attention. Small checkerboard stimuli were flashed in random order to the four quadrants of the visual field at a rapid rate while subjects attended to stimuli in one quadrant at a time. Attended stimuli elicited enhanced ERP components in the latency range 80-200 ms that were co-localized with fMRI a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

69
440
6
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(521 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
69
440
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in contrast to the current paradigm, in previous work participants were focusing only on stimulus presentation. Evoked responses in multiple sensory modalities have been shown to be substantially larger under conditions of direct attention ([Di Russo et al, 2003], [Giabbiconi et al, 2007], [Kida et al, 2004], [Martínez et al, 2006] and [Poghosyan and Ioannides, 2008]), and as mentioned previously, the evoked neural CR is smaller than the response to the US, even under conditions of direct attention (Moses et al, 2005). These observations may account for the lack of an evoked CR found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, in contrast to the current paradigm, in previous work participants were focusing only on stimulus presentation. Evoked responses in multiple sensory modalities have been shown to be substantially larger under conditions of direct attention ([Di Russo et al, 2003], [Giabbiconi et al, 2007], [Kida et al, 2004], [Martínez et al, 2006] and [Poghosyan and Ioannides, 2008]), and as mentioned previously, the evoked neural CR is smaller than the response to the US, even under conditions of direct attention (Moses et al, 2005). These observations may account for the lack of an evoked CR found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Attended corner offsets elicited enlarged P1 (80-128 msec) and N1 (160-196 msec) components, which is the typical pattern of ERP enhancement produced by spatial attention (e.g., (Di Russo et al 2003;Hopfinger et al 2004). In addition, there was a smaller augmentation of the N1 elicited by the offsets at the unattended end of the attended bar relative to the offsets occurring on the unattended bar.…”
Section: Physiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this early time window, ERP components, such as the N1 and P1, have been associated with the ability to inhibit responses to incoming sensory information (Di Russo et al 2003). N1 and P1 effects have primarily been identified in behavioral inhibition paradigms, such as the Stop-signal (Bekker et al 2005), Go/No-go (S. J.…”
Section: Erps For Inhibition In the First 200 Msmentioning
confidence: 99%