2016
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjw102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound-Triggered Production of Antiaggregation Pheromone Limits Overcrowding ofDendroctonus valensAttacking Pine Trees

Abstract: For insects that aggregate on host plants, both attraction and antiaggregation among conspecifics can be important mechanisms for overcoming host resistance and avoiding overcrowding, respectively. These mechanisms can involve multiple sensory modalities, such as sound and pheromones. We explored how acoustic and chemical signals are integrated by the bark beetle Dendroctonus valens to limit aggregation in China. In its native North American range, this insect conducts nonlethal attacks on weakened trees at ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it supports that mass trapping could potentially be a valid approach to decrease population density by increasing the difficulty of mate finding, especially by imposing Allee effects at low densities (Tobin et al, 2011). Second, combined with our studies, Liu et al (2013) and Liu et al (2017a) have establishment that frontalin functions as an aggregation pheromone and exobrevicomin functions as anti-aggregation pheromone, which supports the potential application of the push-pull strategy for protecting pine trees in North America (Cook et al, 2007). Third, various acoustic sounds were shown to attract or repel males, and manipulation of such signals may have potential to reduce beetle success in high-value trees (Hofstetter et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…First, it supports that mass trapping could potentially be a valid approach to decrease population density by increasing the difficulty of mate finding, especially by imposing Allee effects at low densities (Tobin et al, 2011). Second, combined with our studies, Liu et al (2013) and Liu et al (2017a) have establishment that frontalin functions as an aggregation pheromone and exobrevicomin functions as anti-aggregation pheromone, which supports the potential application of the push-pull strategy for protecting pine trees in North America (Cook et al, 2007). Third, various acoustic sounds were shown to attract or repel males, and manipulation of such signals may have potential to reduce beetle success in high-value trees (Hofstetter et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, one approach to interfere with mate location behaviors could be artificial transmission of female vibrational signals that attract males to a trap (i.e., attract and kill) (Mazzoni et al ., unpublished). Another approach is the use of vibrational signals to induce release of alarm pheromones, which elicit dispersal behavior in individuals on the host plant (i.e., repellency) . The vibrational mating disruption method is based on the concept that transmission of a disruptive signal (DS) prevents or alters signal perception by the receiver located on the treated substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 For species that communicate or obtain information through substrate-borne vibrational signals, the application of mechanical principles that result in little to no negative environmental impact may constitute a valuable alternative and/or complement to pesticide applications. 3,4 Current approaches to exploiting vibrational signals include techniques to prevent insect pests from colonizing host plants, 5 mass trapping (Mazzoni et al, unpublished), and mating disruption 6 -8 to reduce population densities. The choice of approach depends on detailed knowledge of the composition of landscape vibrational signals, noise associated with the target species, and vibrations that elicit specific insect behavioral responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most bark beetle species infest Pinus spp. [15,16], with several of these beetles being regarded as secondary intruders that colonize dead, diseased, or weakened trees [17,18]; however, a few beetles, such as those of Dendroctonus valens LeConte, Ips typographus Linnaeus, Scolytus multistriatus Marsham, and Tomicus yunnanensis Kirkendall and Faccoli, can colonize and kill healthy hosts [19,20]. Tomicus spp., which are among the most destructive beetles, can kill large numbers of healthy trees during periodic outbreaks [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%