2002
DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation

Abstract: Sound repetition rate plays an important role in stream segregation, temporal pattern recognition, and the perception of successive sounds as either distinct or fused. This study was aimed at elucidating the neural coding of repetition rate and its perceptual correlates. We investigated the representations of rate in the auditory pathway of human listeners using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), an indicator of population neural activity. Stimuli were trains of noise bursts presented at rates rangi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
138
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(86 reference statements)
22
138
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a strong contralateral selectivity in these temporal auditory regions has been reported previously using monaural stimulation (Jäncke et al, 2002) and in selective orientation to one ear during dichotic listening (Hall et al, 2000;Jäncke et al, 2003). Our results probably refer to processes distinct from those corresponding to an increased activity in the superior temporal gyrus after regular patterns of sound (Hughes et al, 2001;Mustovic et al, 2003), at the offset of long-duration sound (Jäncke et al, 1999;Harms and Melcher, 2002;Seifritz et al, 2002), or induced by a brief period of silence (Kraemer et al, 2005) interpreted as auditory imagery. Auditory imagery has been also shown to increase activity in the auditory areas (Bunzeck et al, 2005;Zatorre and Halpern, 2005) and in the right inferior frontal areas (Hoshiyama et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Such a strong contralateral selectivity in these temporal auditory regions has been reported previously using monaural stimulation (Jäncke et al, 2002) and in selective orientation to one ear during dichotic listening (Hall et al, 2000;Jäncke et al, 2003). Our results probably refer to processes distinct from those corresponding to an increased activity in the superior temporal gyrus after regular patterns of sound (Hughes et al, 2001;Mustovic et al, 2003), at the offset of long-duration sound (Jäncke et al, 1999;Harms and Melcher, 2002;Seifritz et al, 2002), or induced by a brief period of silence (Kraemer et al, 2005) interpreted as auditory imagery. Auditory imagery has been also shown to increase activity in the auditory areas (Bunzeck et al, 2005;Zatorre and Halpern, 2005) and in the right inferior frontal areas (Hoshiyama et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The ABBB pattern used in the present study offers both advantages of the triplet pattern, because the only difference is that the silent gap between triplets has been filled with another B tone. Filling the gap was important for the fMRI part of this study, in which we examined the time course as well as the magnitude of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses, because actual (or perceived) gaps lead to changes in BOLD time course (Harms and Melcher, 2002;Wilson et al, 2007). By ensuring no physical temporal gaps, we were able to investigate the effect perceived temporal gaps introduced when the percept shifts from one to two streams.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies (Herdener et al, 2007;Hart et al, 2003;Harms & Melcher, 2002), the locus of peak activation can depend on the actual rate of stimulation and can shift from HG for high rates of stimulation to the STG lateral and posterior of HG for lower rates. For instance, Hart et al (2003) compared sustained harmonic complexes and tones to complexes with sound onset rates of 5 Hz.…”
Section: Sound Onsetmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, in a preliminary report, Cusack, Carlyon, Johnsrude, and Epstein (2001) showed greater activation in HG for tones presented to the two ears when there was a small onset disparity between them, resulting in the percept of two sounds, than when they started synchronously, leading to the percept of a single sound. More recently, Harms, Guinan, Sigalovsky, and Melcher (2005) and Harms and Melcher (2002) have shown greater activation in HG for bursts of white noise presented with fast (8-10 Hz) onset rates, compared to slower rates, whereas the same pattern was not observed in the STG. Other studies have also shown relatively greater activation in HG to sounds with high onset rates, with a different pattern of results observed in regions closer to the STG (Herdener et al, Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%