[1993] Proceedings Seventh International Parallel Processing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/ipps.1993.262877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorting n numbers on n*n reconfigurable meshes with buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several constant time sorting algorithms for reconfigurable meshes were proposed which sort N numbers on meshes of size N Â N [8], [53], [54].…”
Section: Sorting and Selection: Schnorr And Shamirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several constant time sorting algorithms for reconfigurable meshes were proposed which sort N numbers on meshes of size N Â N [8], [53], [54].…”
Section: Sorting and Selection: Schnorr And Shamirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computing models for a p-sorter do exist. For example, it is known that p elements can be sorted in yI time on a reconfigurable mesh of size p  p [13], [17], [19], [20]. A reconfigurable mesh is a multiprocessor system in which the processors are connected by a bus system whose configuration can be dynamically changed to suit computational needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [1,4,11,15,16,26] Even in the most powerful CRCW PRAM, we know that sorting takes fl( lo ffi 0 " ) time given only a polynomial number of processors. Thus the reconfigurable network seems to a be an attractive model of computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same time bound, the processor bound has been reduced to n 2 by Refs. [1,4,11,15,16]. The later algorithm is the best possible under some weak assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%