2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0531(03)00256-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorting equilibrium in a multi-jurisdiction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For a survey of the mathematical results involved see McLennan [14] and Munkres [15]). Similar ideas have already been used in Caplin and Nalebuff [9] and Gomberg [12].…”
Section: Theorem 1 If Assumptions A1-a2 O1-o3 P1-p3 Are Satisfiedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(For a survey of the mathematical results involved see McLennan [14] and Munkres [15]). Similar ideas have already been used in Caplin and Nalebuff [9] and Gomberg [12].…”
Section: Theorem 1 If Assumptions A1-a2 O1-o3 P1-p3 Are Satisfiedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They show that existence of overall equilibrium with distinct platforms ("pluralistic equilibrium") in the two-party case depends on the odd-even dimensionality of the policy space. This result follows from the theoretical development of Caplin and Nalebuff (1997) and Gomberg (2004), which showed that conditions necessary to ensure existence of pluralistic equilibria in twojurisdiction (including two-party) models are sensitive to the parity of policy space dimension. The apparently paradoxical result is somewhat clarified by the example in Gomberg (2005), which suggests a more complex interaction between the number of parties and the dimensionality of the policy space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…to achieve a deeper understanding of the topological properties of the partition space . So far, such results are available only for the two-community case (see Gomberg 2004).…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%