2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on glass surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is explained by sorption of PAHs on the 209 surfaces in the glass-fibre filter. Sorption of PAHs on glass surfaces is a well-known and inevitable 210 problem (Qian et al 2011); the sorption was shown to decrease with increasing ration of solution 211 volume to contacted surface area (V/S), by using silanized glass and co-solvents. Humic acids were 212…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is explained by sorption of PAHs on the 209 surfaces in the glass-fibre filter. Sorption of PAHs on glass surfaces is a well-known and inevitable 210 problem (Qian et al 2011); the sorption was shown to decrease with increasing ration of solution 211 volume to contacted surface area (V/S), by using silanized glass and co-solvents. Humic acids were 212…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such large differences were not studied here. The S/V ratios of the containers are in the range 0.3-0.5 cm 2 mL -1 (glass and aluminium) and 0.3-0.6 cm 2 mL -1 (FPE) which are rather small differences compared to the ranges tested by Qian et al [21].…”
Section: Pahsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2a). Although the surface/volume (S/V) ratio can have a large impact on the adsorption behaviour of hydrophobic organic pollutants to the container walls, most of the previous studies compared containers with extremely different S/V ratio, such as a 2-mL vial and a 1-L bottle [21]. Such large differences were not studied here.…”
Section: Pahsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations