1994
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.162.6.8191998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistive index for identifying malignant lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is factually correct that low impedance to blood flow with high velocity is suggestive of malignancy, whereas moderate-tohigh impedance to blood flow is correlated to benign tumors. Resistive indices less than 0.4-0.8 [3,5] and pulsatility indexes less than 1.0 are generally considered to be suspicious for malignancy [3][4][5][6]. In the present study, PI \ 0.8 and RI \ 0.6 were considered for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is factually correct that low impedance to blood flow with high velocity is suggestive of malignancy, whereas moderate-tohigh impedance to blood flow is correlated to benign tumors. Resistive indices less than 0.4-0.8 [3,5] and pulsatility indexes less than 1.0 are generally considered to be suspicious for malignancy [3][4][5][6]. In the present study, PI \ 0.8 and RI \ 0.6 were considered for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16] A comparison of various studies has shown that that RI 0.4 and PI <1 is highly suggestive of malignancy. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Conventional USG lacks specificity to differentiate between benign and malignant masses. So, this study is conducted to see the effectiveness of colour flow mapping and pulsed Doppler studies in determining the nature of tumour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of SCHNEIDER et al 35 , for RI <0.40 values were remarkably similar. Subsequent studies have also showed low rates of detection for ovarian cancer when using different cutoff values [36][37][38][39] . The false positive rates in these investigations varied from 2% to 48%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%