2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonodynamic Effect of an Anti-Inflammatory Agent – Emodin on Macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROS-induced cellular damage is considered to be the main mechanism involved in SDT, 21,30,31 and the results of this study confirmed ROS generation ( Figure 4C). The relative ROS level in the ultrasound alone group was slightly but significantly increased by 129.2%±8.8% in the HY alone group and was increased by 244.8%±7.5% in the SDT group.…”
Section: Measurement Of Intracellular Rossupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…ROS-induced cellular damage is considered to be the main mechanism involved in SDT, 21,30,31 and the results of this study confirmed ROS generation ( Figure 4C). The relative ROS level in the ultrasound alone group was slightly but significantly increased by 129.2%±8.8% in the HY alone group and was increased by 244.8%±7.5% in the SDT group.…”
Section: Measurement Of Intracellular Rossupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, 0.25 μg/mL HY and 15 minutes of ultrasound exposure were considered to represent the optimal conditions in this experiment for inducing efficient macrophage death in vitro. The 0.25 μg/mL HY concentration was lower than the concentrations of emodin (15 μg/mL), 21 curcumin (15 μg/mL), 1 and ALA (131.1 μg/mL) 14,17,18 required to obtain a similar sonodynamic effect. The present findings clearly indicate that HY is a more efficient sonosensitizer than those employed previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations