2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-010-0501-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonochemical Degradation of Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds in Water: Effects of Physicochemical Properties of the Compounds on Degradation

Abstract: This study examined a comparative degradation of various chlorinated phenolic compounds including phenol, 4-chlorophenol (4-CP), 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP), 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (2,3,4,6-TeCP), and pentachlorophenol (PCP) using 28, 580, and 1,000 kHz ultrasonic reactors. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide was also determined in order to investigate the efficacy of different sonochemical reactors for hydroxyl radical production. Clearly, it was observed that the 580… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their toxicity and persistence can directly impact the health of ecosystems and present a threat through the contamination of water bodies (Ahmed et al 2011). Mono-and dichlorophenols are a major source of water pollution from industrial waste discharge (Park et al 2011). Therefore, due to these public health and environmental concerns, costeffective remedial strategies are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their toxicity and persistence can directly impact the health of ecosystems and present a threat through the contamination of water bodies (Ahmed et al 2011). Mono-and dichlorophenols are a major source of water pollution from industrial waste discharge (Park et al 2011). Therefore, due to these public health and environmental concerns, costeffective remedial strategies are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each system, the amount of solute and water molecules in the simulation boxes was chosen in order to obtain compositions slightly below the solubility limit for each system and temperature [47][48][49][50]. In some cases (e.g., 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol) that choice was not feasible given the low solubility of the solutes in water.…”
Section: Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMZ kinetic constant was higher, 6.38 ± 0.44 L MJ -1 (r 2 = 0.99) than the TBZ kinetic constant, 1.81 ± 0.29 L MJ -1 (r 2 = 0.94). These different degradation rates are determined by their physico-chemical properties, such as log(K OW ), water solubility (S w ), vapour pressure (Vp) and acid dissociation constant (pKa) ( Table 3) [29]. TBZ and IMZ are non-volatile compounds so their degradation inside the cavitation bubble due to high temperatures would be negligible.…”
Section: Efficiency and Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%