The electrochemical advanced oxidation
process (EAOP) has gained
popularity in the field of water purification. During the EAOP, it
is in the boundary layer of the anode–solution interface that
organic pollutants are oxidized by hydroxyl radicals (•OH) produced from water oxidation. Applying current to an anode dissipates
heat to the surroundings according to Joule’s law, leading
to an interfacial temperature that is much higher than that of the
bulk solution, which is known as the “interfacial Joule heating”
(IJH) effect. The modeling and experimental results show that the
IJH effect had an inevitable consequence for the activity of •OH, rate constants, and mass transport within the boundary
layer. The interfacial temperature could be increased from 25 to 70.2
°C, a value mostly doubling that of the bulk solution (33.6 °C)
at the end of a 120 min electrolysis (10 mA cm–2). Correspondingly, the •OH concentration available
for oxidation of organic pollutants was much lower than that calculated
at a constant temperature of 25 °C probably due to H2O2 formation via •OH dimerization. The
enhanced •OH diffusion resulting from strengthened
molecular thermodynamic movement and decreased kinematic viscosity
of the solution also drove •OH to move far from
the anode surface and thus extended the maximum thickness of the boundary
layer. The oxidation rate was positively correlated to the interfacial
temperature, the activation energy, and the number of activated molecules,
indicated by a 1.57–2.28-fold increase depending on the target
organic compounds. The finding of the IJH effect prompts a re-examination
of the literature based on a realistic rather than a constant temperature
(e.g., 20–30 °C), the case reflected in a number of prior
studies that does not exist virtually, and reconsideration of behaviors
that can be attributed to the change in temperature during EAOP.