2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion is in line with other recent findings on individual differences in vocal interactions in nightingales (Schmidt et al 2006. It is reasonable to assume that bigger and heavier birds are of higher quality because such individuals were found to arrive earlier in their breeding ground after migration, and they also had bigger song repertoires (Kipper et al 2006). Moreover, male nightingales that arrive earlier on their breeding 5 Maximum song levels of captive zebra finches (N=41 males) and a body size and b residual body mass (dB re.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This notion is in line with other recent findings on individual differences in vocal interactions in nightingales (Schmidt et al 2006. It is reasonable to assume that bigger and heavier birds are of higher quality because such individuals were found to arrive earlier in their breeding ground after migration, and they also had bigger song repertoires (Kipper et al 2006). Moreover, male nightingales that arrive earlier on their breeding 5 Maximum song levels of captive zebra finches (N=41 males) and a body size and b residual body mass (dB re.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It would be very interesting to investigate, whether the correlations between repertoire size and body size that we found in our study population also exist in other blackbird populations. However, the fact that our finding is in line with other investigations of correlations between repertoire size and morphological measures in other species (Lampe & Espmark, 1994;Mountjoy & Lemon, 1996;Balsby, 2000;Kipper et al, 2006) may suggest that our findings are not specific to the island population we studied, but a more general trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Studies in several species found correlations between repertoire size and different aspects of male quality, e.g., between repertoire size and body condition (starling, Mountjoy & Lemon, 1996; sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus), Buchanan et al, 1999; song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), Reid et al, 2005;Pfaff et al, 2007;common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos), Kipper et al, 2006), between repertoire size and body size (whitethroat (Sylvia communis) Balsby, 2000;common nightingale, Kipper et al, 2006), between repertoire size and age (e.g., common nightingale, Kiefer et al, 2006Kiefer et al, , 2009, but also between repertoire size and social status (starling, Spencer et al, 2004) or learning ability (zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), Boogert et al, 2008). According to these results, song repertoire size seems to be an indicator for different correlates of a male's general quality, and by choosing mates with large repertoires, females might obtain larger, healthier, or more experienced males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic features of songs have been shown to reflect various properties of potential mates, such as early developmental conditions (Nowicki et al, 1998;Buchanan et al, 2003;Spencer et al, 2003;Soma et al, 2006;Zann & Cash, 2007), body condition (Lampe & Espmark, 1994;Hoi-Leitner et al, 1995;Kipper et al, 2006), genetic quality (Hasselquist et al, 1996), and parental care (Welling et al, 1997;Buchanan & Catchpole, 2000). Because these qualities and conditions of individuals are likely to affect their offspring either directly (e.g., through resource provisioning) or indirectly (i.e., genetically), the song quality of the father can be used as a factor to predict offspring fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%