increasing their access to key resources, such as food or mates.1-5 Alternatively, it has 5 been argued to be a non-adaptive result of human impacts, such as habitat destruction 6 or provisioning of food. [6][7][8][9] To discriminate between these hypotheses we compiled long-7 term information from 18 chimpanzee communities and 4 bonobo communities. Our 8 data include 152 killings (N=58 observed, 41 inferred, and 53 suspected killings) by 9 chimpanzees in 15 communities and one suspected killing by bonobos. We found that 10 males had the greatest involvement as attackers (92% of participants) and victims 11 (73%); most killings (66%) involved intercommunity attacks; and attackers greatly 12 outnumbered their victims (median 8:1 ratio). Variation in rates of killing among 13communities depended on demographic variables but was unrelated to measures of 14 human impacts. These results from all major study populations over the last five 15 decades are consistent with previously proposed adaptive explanations for killing by 16 chimpanzees but not with the human impact hypothesis. 17 18Conspecific killing has been documented at multiple chimpanzee study sites, 2-5,10-12 but rates 19 vary greatly among sites. The human impact hypothesis and the adaptive strategies 20 hypothesis yield contrasting predictions, which we test here (Tables 1, 2). The human impact 21 hypothesis states that killing occurs mainly as an incidental outcome of aggression, 22 exacerbated by human activities such as providing a concentrated food resource, 23 deforestation-induced crowding, anthropogenic diseases or hunting. Accordingly, lethal 24 aggression should be high where human disturbance is high. In contrast, the adaptive strategies hypothesis views aggression as an evolved strategic 27 response by which aggressors tend to increase their fitness through increased access to 28 territory, food, mates or other benefits. [1][2][3][4][5][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] 45Intracommunity infanticide by females may result from intense competition among females 46 for the best feeding areas.17 Population differences in rates of killing are accordingly 47 expected to result from socioecological factors such as differences in grouping patterns 2,11 48 and/or demography.14 Lethal aggression thus occurs within a diverse set of circumstances, 49 but is expected to be most commonly committed by males; directed towards males; directed 50 6 towards non-kin, particularly members of other groups; and committed when overwhelming 51 numerical superiority reduces the costs of killing. 52 53Previous studies have developed and tested these specific hypotheses 2,5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] ; the present study 54 represents the first effort to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously with a comprehensive 55 dataset. To do so, we assembled data from 18 chimpanzee communities from both eastern 56 (N=12) and western (N=6) clades 24 of chimpanzees studied over 426 years (median = 21 57 years; range: 4-53) and from 4 bonobo communities studied for 92 years (media...

The ability to recognize other individuals' mental states-their knowledge and beliefs, for example-is a fundamental part of human cognition and may be unique to our species. Tests of a "theory of mind" in animals have yielded conflicting results. Some nonhuman primates can read others' intentions and know what others see, but they may not understand that, in others, perception can lead to knowledge. Using an alarm-call-based field experiment, we show that chimpanzees were more likely to alarm call in response to a snake in the presence of unaware group members than in the presence of aware group members, suggesting that they recognize knowledge and ignorance in others. We monitored the behavior of 33 individuals to a model viper placed on their projected travel path. Alarm calls were significantly more common if the caller was with group members who had either not seen the snake or had not been present when alarm calls were emitted. Other factors, such as own arousal, perceived risk, or risk to receivers, did not significantly explain the likelihood of calling, although they did affect the call rates. Our results suggest that chimpanzees monitor the information available to other chimpanzees and control vocal production to selectively inform them.

Article type: note elements of the manuscript that will appear in the expanded online edition: app. A, methods * Manuscript AbstractStatistical inference based on stepwise model selection is applied regularly in ecological, evolutionary and behavioral research. In addition to fundamental shortcomings with regard to finding the 'best' model, stepwise procedures are known to suffer from a multiple testing problem, yet the method is still widely used. As an illustration of this problem, we present results of a simulation study of artificial datasets of uncorrelated variables, with two to ten predictor variables and one dependent variable. We then compared results from stepwise regression with a regression model in which all predictor variables were entered simultaneously. These analyses clearly demonstrate that significance tests based on stepwise procedures lead to greatly inflated Type I error rates (i.e., the probability of erroneously rejecting a true null-hypothesis). By using a simple simulation design, our study amplifies previous warnings about using stepwise procedures, and we follow others in recommending that biologists refrain from applying these methods.

No abstract

No abstract

The majority of evidence for cultural behavior in animals has come from comparisons between populations separated by large geographical distances that often inhabit different environments. The difficulty of excluding ecological and genetic variation as potential explanations for observed behaviors has led some researchers to challenge the idea of animal culture. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire, crack Coula edulis nuts using stone and wooden hammers and tree root anvils. In this study, we compare for the first time hammer selection for nut cracking across three neighboring chimpanzee communities that live in the same forest habitat, which reduces the likelihood of ecological variation. Furthermore, the study communities experience frequent dispersal of females at maturity, which eliminates significant genetic variation. We compared key ecological factors, such as hammer availability and nut hardness, between the three neighboring communities and found striking differences in group-specific hammer selection among communities despite similar ecological conditions. Differences were found in the selection of hammer material and hammer size in response to changes in nut resistance over time. Our findings highlight the subtleties of cultural differences in wild chimpanzees and illustrate how cultural knowledge is able to shape behavior, creating differences among neighboring social groups.

Aim: To predict the distribution of suitable environmental conditions (SEC) for eight African great ape taxa for a first time period, the 1990s and then project it to a second time period, the 2000s; to assess the relative importance of factors influencing SEC distribution and to estimate rates of SEC loss, isolation and fragmentation over the last two decades. Location: Twenty-two African great ape range countries. Methods: We extracted 15,051 presence localities collected between 1995 and 2010 from 68 different areas surveyed across the African ape range. We combined a maximum entropy algorithm and logistic regression to relate ape presence information to environmental and human impact variables from the 1990s with a resolution of 5 × 5 km across the entire ape range. We then made SEC projections for the 2000s using updated human impact variables. Results: Total SEC area was approximately 2,015,480 and 1,807,653 km2 in the 1990s and 2000s, respectively. Loss of predicted SEC appeared highest for Cross River gorillas (-59%), followed by eastern gorillas (-52%), western gorillas (-32%), bonobos (-29%), central chimpanzees (-17%) and western chimpanzees (-11%). SEC for Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzees and eastern chimpanzees was not greatly reduced. Except for Cross River and eastern gorillas, the number of SEC patches did not change significantly, suggesting that SEC loss was caused mainly by patch size reduction. Main conclusions: The first continent-wide perspective of African ape SEC distribution shows dramatic declines in recent years. The model has clear limitations for use at small geographic scales, given the quality of available data and the coarse resolution of predictions. However, at the large scale it has potential for informing international policymaking, mitigation of resource extraction and infrastructure development, as well as for spatial prioritization of conservation effort and evaluating conservation effectiveness.Additional co-authors: Head, J.,Huijbregts, B., Lindsell, J., McLennan, M., Martinez, L., Morgan, D., N'Goran K.P., Ntongho, A., Petre, C.A., Regnaut, S., Sanz, C., Tondossama, A

Intergroup conflict is evident throughout the history of our species, ubiquitous across human societies, and considered crucial for the evolution of humans' large-scale cooperative nature. Like humans, chimpanzee societies exhibit intragroup coordination and coalitionary support during violent intergroup conflicts. In both species, cooperation among group members is essential for individuals to gain access to benefits from engaging in intergroup conflict. Studies suggest that a contributive mechanism regulating in-group cooperation during intergroup conflicts in humans involves the neuropeptide hormone oxytocin, known to influence trust, coordination, and social cognition, although evidence from natural settings is lacking. Here, applying a noninvasive method, we investigate oxytocinergic system involvement during natural intergroup conflicts in wild chimpanzees. We found that chimpanzees of both sexes had significantly higher urinary oxytocin levels immediately before and during intergroup conflict compared with controls. Also, elevated hormone levels were linked with greater cohesion during intergroup conflicts, rather than with the level of potential threat posed by rival groups, intragroup affiliative social interactions, or coordinated behavior alone. Thus, the oxytocinergic system, potentially engendering cohesion and cooperation when facing an out-group threat, may not be uniquely human but rather a mechanism with evolutionary roots shared by our last common ancestor with chimpanzees, likely expediting fitness gains during intergroup conflict.Pan troglodytes | cooperation | group cohesion | neuropeptide | parochial altruism R ecent evolutionary models suggest that parochial altruism,