2020
DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2019-0396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sometimes Your Best Just Ain’t Good Enough: The Worldwide Evidence on Subjective Well-being Efficiency

Abstract: Most of the studies on subjective well-being focus on the determinants of absolute life satisfaction or happiness levels. This paper asks an important but understudied question, namely, could countries achieve the same or even higher subjective well-being by using the same resources more efficiently? We provide the first country panel evidence on whether nations efficiently transform their endowments (income, education, and health) into subjective well-being and which factors influence the conversion efficienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest of policymakers and welfare economists on this issue is interpreted by several factors. Firstly, socioeconomic monetary indicators are not sufficient to interpret human well-being ( Frugoli et al, 2015 ), thus, the emergent literature is using subjective well-being as an indicator to gauge the happiness of citizens ( Nikolova and Popova, 2021 ). Secondly, empirical studies exploring the quality of life can help in evaluating the welfare impacts of various factors such as contamination, environmental variables, unemployment status, education, and health ( Cuñado and de Gracia, 2012 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest of policymakers and welfare economists on this issue is interpreted by several factors. Firstly, socioeconomic monetary indicators are not sufficient to interpret human well-being ( Frugoli et al, 2015 ), thus, the emergent literature is using subjective well-being as an indicator to gauge the happiness of citizens ( Nikolova and Popova, 2021 ). Secondly, empirical studies exploring the quality of life can help in evaluating the welfare impacts of various factors such as contamination, environmental variables, unemployment status, education, and health ( Cuñado and de Gracia, 2012 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a deeper interaction between blocks, it is necessary to consider the correlation between block processes. For example, this is the influence of funding for higher education and employment of the population who received this education, or work in the specialty of graduates having secondary vocational education and higher education (Miao, 2020;Nikolova & Popova, 2020;Pi et al, 2017;. And it is necessary to know how the process block, namely its indicators, correlates with the rest of the indicators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the revealed patterns, a sharp increase of L7, L9, L10 indicators in 2012 is related to the financing of secondary vocational education. The uneven development of the financing process has led to qualitative changes in the indicators connected with the innovative activity of companies in the direction of their reduction (Nikolova & Popova, 2020;Pi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%