2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-013-0263-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Something Old, Something New: Evidence of Self-Accommodation to Gendered Social Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, demand characteristics are unable to explain the finding that participants in the traditional condition seem to show counter reactions to this norm such that they show lower intentions to hide their communal engagement and they show higher support for gender-related social change. Moreover, the current work is consistent with other studies in which norms were manipulated revealing similar effects (e.g., Schroeder and Prentice, 1998 ; Stangor et al, 2001 ; Sechrist and Milford, 2007 ; Diekman et al, 2013 ). Further research should investigate whether manipulated norms indeed change the actual perception of norms and lower pluralistic ignorance, and how long these effects persist.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, demand characteristics are unable to explain the finding that participants in the traditional condition seem to show counter reactions to this norm such that they show lower intentions to hide their communal engagement and they show higher support for gender-related social change. Moreover, the current work is consistent with other studies in which norms were manipulated revealing similar effects (e.g., Schroeder and Prentice, 1998 ; Stangor et al, 2001 ; Sechrist and Milford, 2007 ; Diekman et al, 2013 ). Further research should investigate whether manipulated norms indeed change the actual perception of norms and lower pluralistic ignorance, and how long these effects persist.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, identifying oneself with a gender does not necessarily imply endorsing its stereotypical roles (Kite et al, 2008;Dean and Tate, 2017). This appears to be especially true for women, whose gender stereotypes tend to be more dynamic in time (Diekman and Eagly, 2000;Koch et al, 2005;Zafra and Garcia-Retamero, 2011;Diekman et al, 2013;Bosak et al, 2017) and across countries (Weinberg et al, 2000;Higgins et al, 2002;Zafra and Garcia-Retamero, 2011;Constantin and Voicu, 2014;Hall and Pichon, 2014).…”
Section: Gender Roles and Stereotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing research does suggest that both men and women perceive it to be a problem that men’s communal tendencies have not changed over time, to the degree that they expect men to take on more communal roles in the future (Diekman & Goodfriend, 2006; see also Diekman & Eagly, 2008). Furthermore, when men and women are prompted to think that gender roles are changing, both predict that they could be successful (although not necessarily more interested) in non-stereotypic occupations (Diekman, Johnston, & Loescher, 2013). Such findings provide preliminary evidence that, as people’s beliefs about the rigidity of male gender roles soften, men might be more likely to internalize communal traits (Eagly & Diekman, 2003).…”
Section: Internal Factors That Preclude Men From Adopting Communal Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%