2017
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2017.35.3.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Something in the Way You Primed Me: Belief Monitoring When Source Identification Is Not Possible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies (Santos, Garcia-Marques, Mackie, Ferreira, et al, 2012;Santos, Garcia-Marques, Mackie, Palma, et al, 2017) have shown the extent to which such incorporation can influence stereotypes. Even stereotype-unrelated traits may become "one of the best descriptors of the group" when they have been subtly primed in an unrelated task.…”
Section: The Malleability Of Social Stereotypes and Other Social Knowledge Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies (Santos, Garcia-Marques, Mackie, Ferreira, et al, 2012;Santos, Garcia-Marques, Mackie, Palma, et al, 2017) have shown the extent to which such incorporation can influence stereotypes. Even stereotype-unrelated traits may become "one of the best descriptors of the group" when they have been subtly primed in an unrelated task.…”
Section: The Malleability Of Social Stereotypes and Other Social Knowledge Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was determined by a priori power analysis conducted using G*Power 65 . Past research on this topic 23 , 28 , 55 , led us to expect medium-sized effects (based on the conventions established by 71 ). We assumed a medium effect size and a correlation of 0.5 between measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of professional groups and primed concepts was guided by earlier work outlined in 23 , 24 , 28 , 55 , and for a detailed procedure, refer to 23 , 24 . Indeed, previous studies 23 , 24 , 28 (after pretesting) identified four target groups with strong consensual stereotypes: computer programmers (intelligent), construction workers (not intelligent), childcare professionals (friendly), and disco bouncers (unfriendly).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation