1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-65950-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Trends in the Classification of Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coefficient measures the extent of a monotonic relation between square root profiles of probabilities, and is also suitable for ordinal variables, as is the case of this set of items. This measure of comparison between elements was combined with two classical aggregation criteria, Single Linkage (SL) and Complete Linkage (CL) [34], and three probabilistic aggregation criteria, AVL (Aggregation Validity Link), AV1, and AVB (Aggregation Validity B-Link) [35,36], within the scope of the VL Methodology (V for validity, L for linkage) (Figures 3 and 4). According to p. 89):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This coefficient measures the extent of a monotonic relation between square root profiles of probabilities, and is also suitable for ordinal variables, as is the case of this set of items. This measure of comparison between elements was combined with two classical aggregation criteria, Single Linkage (SL) and Complete Linkage (CL) [34], and three probabilistic aggregation criteria, AVL (Aggregation Validity Link), AV1, and AVB (Aggregation Validity B-Link) [35,36], within the scope of the VL Methodology (V for validity, L for linkage) (Figures 3 and 4). According to p. 89):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the global statistics of levels, STAT [35,37], the best partition is a partition into three clusters obtained at level 3 by all aggregation criteria (STAT = 2.8723): Cluster 1: {i, ii}; Cluster 2: {iii, iv, v}; and Cluster 3: {vi}.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coefficient was combined with 26 aggregation criteria, 12 of which were classical (SL, CL,…, AMGT) and 14 probabilistic (AVM, AVmg,…, AVMLD) (Nicolau, 1983;Nicolau and Bacelar-Nicolau, 1998). The indicators E(h), SIL(h) and Global_Ind(h) presented in Table 1 give detailed information on each of the data units h, taking into consideration the cluster to which they belong, how many data units are contained in the cluster with which the data unit h is associated, and its degree of homogeneity and isolation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each interval variable (generalized column) gave a sub-table with a suitable number of columns corresponding to a set of elementary intervals. The affinity coefficient was combined with three probabilistic aggregation criteria, AVL, AV1, and AVB (Bacelar -Nicolau, 1988;Nicolau and Bacelar-Nicolau, 1998). Table 3 represents the similarity matrix, and Figures 1 and 2 show the dendrograms associated with the AVL and AV1/AVB aggregation criteria respectively.…”
Section: Case Study: Freshwater Fish Data Set (Ecotoxicology Data Set)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probabilistic aggregation criteria used (AVL, AV1 and AVB) under the probabilistic approach of AHCA, named VL methodology (V for Validity, L for Linkage), resort essentially to probabilistic notions for the definition of the comparative functions. In fact, the VL-family is a set of agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods, based on the cumulative distribution function of basic similarity coefficients (Bacelar-Nicolau, 1980, 1988Nicolau and Bacelar-Nicolau, 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%