Abstract:We argue that the accumulated neutrino data, including recent results from KamLAND and K2K, point to a neutrino mixing matrix with (V 11 , V 21 , V 31 ;. We propose some simple neutrino mass matrices which predict such a mixing matrix.In this brief note, we suggest that the accumulating neutrino data [1][2][3], including the recent results from KamLAND [4] and K2K [5], point to a relatively simple neutrino mass matrix. The data can be explained by oscillations between three active neutrinos with the atmospheri… Show more
“…We have θ 23 = 45 • and θ 13 = 0 for all three mixing patterns in question, while θ 12 = arctan(1/ √ 2) ≈ 35.3 • for TBM [2][3][4][5], θ 12 = 45 • for BM [6][7][8] and θ 12 = arctan[2/(1 + √ 5)] ≈ 31.7 • for GR [9][10][11]. 1 For quite a long time, these constant mixing patterns had been regarded as good candidates for the leptonic flavor mixing matrix, as they all agreed with the experimental data fairly well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…where the evolution functions I 0 and I α (for α = e, µ, τ ) are defined as 5) and M Λ ν is the neutrino mass matrix at the high-energy scale Λ. Note that a superscript "Λ" will be attached to the quantity at the high-energy scale Λ, so as to distinguish it from its counterpart at the low-energy scale λ.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two cases of neutrino mass hierarchy are also distinguished, in the assumption that the hierarchy patterns at the low-and high-energy scales are matched, i.e., they are both in NH, or both in IH. 5 The neutrino parameters at the low-energy scale λ are then confronted to the latest global-fit results from ref. [53].…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In table 3, we also list the pull for each observable y i , with its definition given by 5) where the theoretical prediction is referred to that at the best-fit point. We then see that only a fair χ 2 fit is reached for TBM in the NH case, and θ 12 and θ 23 indeed have large pulls, confirming our previous analytical findings.…”
In light of the latest neutrino oscillation data, we examine whether the leptonic flavor mixing matrix can take on an exact form of tri-bimaximal (TBM), golden-ratio (GR) or bimaximal (BM) mixing pattern at a superhigh-energy scale, where such a mixing pattern could be realized by a flavor symmetry, and become compatible with experimental data at the low-energy scale. Within the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), the only hope for realizing such a possibility is to count on the corrections from the renomalization-group (RG) running. In this work we focus on these radiative corrections, and fully explore the allowed parameter space for each of these mixing patterns. We find that when the upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses Σ ν ≡ m 1 + m 2 + m 3 < 0.23 eV at the 95% confidence level from Planck 2015 is taken into account, none of these mixing patterns can be identified as the leptonic mixing matrix below the seesaw threshold. If this cosmological upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses were relaxed, the TBM and GR mixing patterns would still be compatible with the latest neutrino oscillation data at the 3σ level, but not at the 1σ level. Even in this case, no such a possibility exists for the BM mixing.
“…We have θ 23 = 45 • and θ 13 = 0 for all three mixing patterns in question, while θ 12 = arctan(1/ √ 2) ≈ 35.3 • for TBM [2][3][4][5], θ 12 = 45 • for BM [6][7][8] and θ 12 = arctan[2/(1 + √ 5)] ≈ 31.7 • for GR [9][10][11]. 1 For quite a long time, these constant mixing patterns had been regarded as good candidates for the leptonic flavor mixing matrix, as they all agreed with the experimental data fairly well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…where the evolution functions I 0 and I α (for α = e, µ, τ ) are defined as 5) and M Λ ν is the neutrino mass matrix at the high-energy scale Λ. Note that a superscript "Λ" will be attached to the quantity at the high-energy scale Λ, so as to distinguish it from its counterpart at the low-energy scale λ.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two cases of neutrino mass hierarchy are also distinguished, in the assumption that the hierarchy patterns at the low-and high-energy scales are matched, i.e., they are both in NH, or both in IH. 5 The neutrino parameters at the low-energy scale λ are then confronted to the latest global-fit results from ref. [53].…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)167mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In table 3, we also list the pull for each observable y i , with its definition given by 5) where the theoretical prediction is referred to that at the best-fit point. We then see that only a fair χ 2 fit is reached for TBM in the NH case, and θ 12 and θ 23 indeed have large pulls, confirming our previous analytical findings.…”
In light of the latest neutrino oscillation data, we examine whether the leptonic flavor mixing matrix can take on an exact form of tri-bimaximal (TBM), golden-ratio (GR) or bimaximal (BM) mixing pattern at a superhigh-energy scale, where such a mixing pattern could be realized by a flavor symmetry, and become compatible with experimental data at the low-energy scale. Within the framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), the only hope for realizing such a possibility is to count on the corrections from the renomalization-group (RG) running. In this work we focus on these radiative corrections, and fully explore the allowed parameter space for each of these mixing patterns. We find that when the upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses Σ ν ≡ m 1 + m 2 + m 3 < 0.23 eV at the 95% confidence level from Planck 2015 is taken into account, none of these mixing patterns can be identified as the leptonic mixing matrix below the seesaw threshold. If this cosmological upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses were relaxed, the TBM and GR mixing patterns would still be compatible with the latest neutrino oscillation data at the 3σ level, but not at the 1σ level. Even in this case, no such a possibility exists for the BM mixing.
“…Note added: It has been called to my attention by A.Zee that the matrix (9) in this paper is similar to M 0 with y = −1, given by X.G.He and A.Zee [16]. Our motivation is rather different.…”
Phenomenological implications of neutrino oscillations implied by recent experimental data on pattern of neutrino mass matrix are disscussed. It is shown that it is possible to have a neutrino mass matrix which shows approximate flavor symmetry; the neutrino mass differences arise from flavor violation in off-diagonal Yukawa couplings. Two modest extensions of the standard model, which can embed the resulting neutrino mass matix have also been discussed.
In this review article, we highlight the impact of models incorporating flavour symmetries on charged lepton flavour violating (LFV) processes. Flavour symmetries provide a natural approach to explain the peculiar mass hierarchies and mixing patterns of the Standard Model fermions. New sources of LFV are generally present in new physics beyond the Standard Model, and flavour symmetries can make distinctive predictions for LFV observables. Their discovery can provide crucial information to distinguish flavour symmetries and new physics scenarios in general. Because of their high sensitivity, we will focus on searches for lowenergy LFV processes such as µ → eγ or µ − e conversion in nuclei but we will also highlight the potential impact of LFV processes at the LHC. If new physics occurs at a scale accessible by the LHC, the flavour operators they induce could potentially be probed in high detail. * Electronic address: f.deppisch@ucl.ac.uk
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.