Natural Rights Individualism and Progressivism in American Political Philosophy 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139237116.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Second Thoughts on Progressivism and Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bailey's academic work centered on the problematic race relations between Blacks and Whites in the South, a central subject in Odum's subsequent intellectual path. Bailey actively oriented him toward these questions while, in the best ideological line of American progressivism (Eisenach, 2006;Ekirch, 1973), he infected him with a firm, determined confidence in the reformist potential of knowledge and scientific research (Brazil, 1988;Rotabi, 2007;Sanders, 2003).…”
Section: Howard W Odum and Progressivism-a Crossroadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bailey's academic work centered on the problematic race relations between Blacks and Whites in the South, a central subject in Odum's subsequent intellectual path. Bailey actively oriented him toward these questions while, in the best ideological line of American progressivism (Eisenach, 2006;Ekirch, 1973), he infected him with a firm, determined confidence in the reformist potential of knowledge and scientific research (Brazil, 1988;Rotabi, 2007;Sanders, 2003).…”
Section: Howard W Odum and Progressivism-a Crossroadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is historically known as the political and intellectual movement that developed between the last glimmer of the 19th century and the end of the First World War, and reacted against the political corruption and the most perverse effects of industrialization and laissez-faire individualism. This reaction was due in part to the progressives' sensitivity to social injustice and in part because of their perception that democratic egalitarianism could be at risk if these effects became pronounced (Eisenach, 2006; Ekirch, 1973). Apart from this, there was no body of programmed ideas, but rather a diffuse ideology.…”
Section: The Sociopolitical Context: Citizenship and Progressivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some historians, this movement and its related political practices defined modern American citizenship (Eisenach, 2006, pp. vii–xi).…”
Section: The Sociopolitical Context: Citizenship and Progressivismmentioning
confidence: 99%