2013
DOI: 10.1142/s2010326312500177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Remarks on the Dozier–silverstein Theorem for Random Matrices With Dependent Entries

Abstract: The Dozier-Silverstein theorem asserts the almost sure convergence of the empirical spectral distribution of information plus noise matrices, i.e. perturbations of deterministic matrices whose spectral distribution converges (information matrices) by random matrices with i.i.d. entries (noise matrices). We show that a modification of the original proof given by Dozier and Silverstein allows to extend this result to more general noise matrices, in particular matrices with independent columns satisfying a natura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one can construct boldx(n) in (2), satisfying (A1‐A2), in such a way that Kn=O(n1/2) while 0 is an eigenvalue of X(n) of multiplicity at least cn , which would contradict the fact that ν z is absolutely continuous. Proof of Theorem First of all, note that since Kn=o(n1/2), we have E|X11(n)|4=o(n) and E|X11(n)|3=o(n1/2). If Kn=O(1), the result follows from , Theorem 2.11 and Proposition 2.12]. In fact one can check that the proof given there works for K n being a small power of n .…”
Section: Limiting Distribution Of the Singular Values Of Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, one can construct boldx(n) in (2), satisfying (A1‐A2), in such a way that Kn=O(n1/2) while 0 is an eigenvalue of X(n) of multiplicity at least cn , which would contradict the fact that ν z is absolutely continuous. Proof of Theorem First of all, note that since Kn=o(n1/2), we have E|X11(n)|4=o(n) and E|X11(n)|3=o(n1/2). If Kn=O(1), the result follows from , Theorem 2.11 and Proposition 2.12]. In fact one can check that the proof given there works for K n being a small power of n .…”
Section: Limiting Distribution Of the Singular Values Of Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Operator norm. One way to improve our growth/integrability assumptions would be to obtain a better bound on the operator norm of X (n) defined in (2). The simple bound we use (Lemma 4.2) is E X (n) ≤ CK n √ n. By analogy with results available for matrices with i.i.d.…”
Section: Discussion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…rows, such as for certain random Markov matrices [11], for random matrices with i.i.d. log-concave rows [1,2], for random ±1 matrices with i.i.d. rows of given sum [35] (see also [40]), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with the model of random matrices with i.i.d. log-concave rows studied in [1], for which it turned out that the circular law holds without assuming unconditionality, as explained in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%