2015
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular law for random matrices with exchangeable entries

Abstract: Abstract. An exchangeable random matrix is a random matrix with distribution invariant under any permutation of the entries. For such random matrices, we show, as the dimension tends to infinity, that the empirical spectral distribution tends to the uniform law on the unit disc. This is an instance of the universality phenomenon known as the circular law, for a model of random matrices with dependent entries, rows, and columns. It is also a non-Hermitian counterpart of a result of Chatterjee on the semi-circul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , x σ(n) ), we recover the deviation inequality by Adamczak, Chafaï and Wolff [ACW14] (Theorem 3.1) obtained from Theorem 5.6 by Talagrand. This concentration property plays a key role in their approach, to study the convergence of the empirical spectral measure of random matrices with exchangeable entries, when the size of these matrices is increasing.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…. , x σ(n) ), we recover the deviation inequality by Adamczak, Chafaï and Wolff [ACW14] (Theorem 3.1) obtained from Theorem 5.6 by Talagrand. This concentration property plays a key role in their approach, to study the convergence of the empirical spectral measure of random matrices with exchangeable entries, when the size of these matrices is increasing.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…(1) n = 1 √ npn A n and B (2) n which is the matrix of i.i.d. centered complex Gaussian entries with variance 1/n.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Proof Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to obtain (26). To do so, the idea, as in [ACW14], is to show that the assertion f (A, Π n ) < t 2 implies that √ Z < √ C A + t max 1≤i,j≤n {a i,j }, and to conclude by contraposition. Then, the two following steps consist in choosing appropriate constants C A in (26) depending on the median of Z, such that both P √ Z ≥ √ C A + t max 1≤i,j≤n {a i,j } and P(Z ∈ A) are greater than 1/2, in order to control both probabilities…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 21mentioning
confidence: 99%