Compositionality in Formal Semantics 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9780470751305.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Puzzles of Predicate Possessives

Abstract: 1.Background: Possessives and the argument-modifier distinction in NPs.Possessive constructions like John's teacher, John's team, John's cat, friend of John's offer an interesting test-bed for the argument-modifier distinction in NPs, both in English and cross-linguistically. Many, perhaps all, possessives seem to have some properties of arguments and some of modifiers, but some seem more argument-like and some more modifier-like. Recent proposals by Jensen and Vikner (1994), Vikner and Jensen (ms.1999), Parte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…as measured by human judges is low when compared to human-written captions (Vinyals et al, 2017, Section 5.3.2). It is widely believed that systematic compositionality is a key property of human language that is essential for making generalizations from limited data (Montague, 1974;Partee, 1984;. In this work, we investigate to what extent image captioning models are capable of compositional language understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as measured by human judges is low when compared to human-written captions (Vinyals et al, 2017, Section 5.3.2). It is widely believed that systematic compositionality is a key property of human language that is essential for making generalizations from limited data (Montague, 1974;Partee, 1984;. In this work, we investigate to what extent image captioning models are capable of compositional language understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Partee and Borschev (2001) point out, it can be difficult to make convincing arguments as to whether (some) predicative possessives contain a possessum or not. Moreover, the arguments that can be made for one language do not necessarily carry over to another language.…”
Section: A Prediction Concerning Predicative Possessivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the more 'canonical' ownership interpretation of the poss possessive relation is available in the predicative structures in (20), motivating the choice of belong to as the English translation of these possessive structures. This pattern, referred to here as the 'strict possession' requirement of predicative poss, has been documented in other languages with morpho-syntactically similar attributive and predicative possessive structures (see Partee & Borschev 2001) and is returned to in Section 4.3.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%