The fields of mental health and education have many mutual ties. When the resources and knowledge from both are pooled, as in some psychoeducational practices, comprehensive diagnostic and treatment programs become possible. While many assessment procedures have been labeled "psychoeducational," they vary from each other in significant ways to the extent that some even ignore or minimize the importance of affective behaviors during the evaluation. This article attempts to outline a psychoeducational assessment approach for use with children and adolescents who display learning and adjustment problems. This approach stresses (a) affective as well as cognitive functioning and the intimate and dynamic relation between the two and (b) "process" rather than "achievement" test variables. Specific process variables pertaining to affective behaviors are described, and case material is presented.Recently a pediatrician asked me to review, with the parents' permission, a test report about a child he had referred to the learning disabilities unit in a large general hospital. The psychoeducational specialist in the unit administered a battery of educational and learning disabilities tests to assess the nature of this child's reading difficulty. The report described in detail the findings from each of the test procedures. However, almost lost at the bottom of one paragraph was a lone sentence noting that on a particular achievement test the girl became very frustrated and the examiner had to discontinue that testing. Nothing else was mentioned about this behavior, and the only recommendation eventually found in the report was for reading tutoring.In reviewing the material I had several concerns. Although the report contained many scores from numerous tests and subtests, very little was offered beyond the general recommendation of reading tutoring. Recommendations failed to consider the child's particular learning style with its strengths and weaknesses, or more specific deficits highlighted by the testing. However, of equal, if not greater, concern to me was the seeming lack of attention paid to the child's emotional reaction when confronted with an apparently difficult learning task. Pages of this psychoeducational evaluation were devoted to test scores, but somewhere the child became lost in the report, buried under an avalanche of numbers.This psychoeducational specialist's report reflects a narrow and static approach to the assessment of children. The report and presumably the evaluation do not capture, as they should, the dynamic interaction of the child with the examiner and the test material. Although bridges continue to be built between educators and mental health specialists and there is an increasing recognition of the close bond between these two fields, the benefits of this union often have not been integrated into the diagnostic endeavor. There is wide diversity among practitioners in determining what is relevant information in assessing a child with learning problems, as is vividly illustrated by the variety of ...