1991
DOI: 10.1115/1.2920653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Parameters Affecting Tactile Friction

Abstract: The friction of a sliding tactile contact was measured in an apparatus which simulated a keyboard. Results were taken for several materials. The friction coefficient was found to decrease with increasing load and with increasing speed. Experiments at varying humidity and surface roughness helped to define the friction mechanisms. It is concluded that tactile friction is predominantly adhesive, but modified by liquid bridging between the ridges of the skin and the counterface. Increased bridging due to higher h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general trend emerging from this work is that the friction coefficient between a hard surface and the skin of the fingertip or hand decreases with an increasing surface roughness [2][3][4][5]. In these papers, the reported surface roughness values varied in the range R a = 0.03-45 lm.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The general trend emerging from this work is that the friction coefficient between a hard surface and the skin of the fingertip or hand decreases with an increasing surface roughness [2][3][4][5]. In these papers, the reported surface roughness values varied in the range R a = 0.03-45 lm.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has also been proposed that the increase of the friction in the presence of moisture is due to capillary forces [33]. It was explained in §2 that the friction depends on the sum of the applied and adhesive forces (see equation (2.8)).…”
Section: Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a result of the smaller real area of contact for the rough compared with the smooth glass. Dinç et al [33] found that the friction of the finger pad decreases with increasing roughness of the countersurface but they believed that this was due to a rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J R Soc Interface 10: 20120467 reduction in the capillary forces. It is an unlikely explanation since the normal forces were in the range 0.1-20 N, which is very much greater than those arising by a capillary mechanism as discussed above.…”
Section: Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations