1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.143.439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Observations on the Interference Fringes Formed by X Rays Scattered from Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation is even better if roughness is included at surface and interfaces. The continuous line represents the simulated reflectivity curve with the thickness and density mentioned above 45 and a surface/interface roughness RMS of 1 nm ͑within the framework of the Croce-Névot model 46 ͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation is even better if roughness is included at surface and interfaces. The continuous line represents the simulated reflectivity curve with the thickness and density mentioned above 45 and a surface/interface roughness RMS of 1 nm ͑within the framework of the Croce-Névot model 46 ͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true density can be determined by the critical angle, and the thickness was analyzed in the fringe pattern obtained with GXRR software based on Parratt's method. 16,19 Since the surface roughness of amorphous carbon films is less than 1.0 nm as shown in the insets of Figs. 1(b) and 1(d), the effect of it on the other measurements (e.g., SE) is negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the true density obtained from XRR method is generally determined by the critical angle, whose simulated value 0.358° is in good agreement with the experimental value 0.360°. The true density can be determined by the critical angle, and the thickness analyses by the fringe pattern which are obtained with GXRR software based on the Parrat's method [28]. Therefore, the discrepancy mentioned above in the large-angle region has no effect on the determination of the GC density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%