2001
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.544.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOME NUT PROPERTIES OF WALNUTS (Juglans regia L.) OF EDREMIT COUNTRY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are at par with the findings of other researchers. As reported by Kazankaya et al (2001) in Turkey, nut as well as kernel weight and kernel ratio of superior walnut genotypes were 11-12 g, 6-7 g and more than 45%, respectively. As per Ebrahimi et al (2011), the nut weight varied from 7.52 to 17.73 g, kernel weight from 4.00 to 9.83 g, and kernel percentage ratio from 38.78 to 67.05% amongst calculated genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Our results are at par with the findings of other researchers. As reported by Kazankaya et al (2001) in Turkey, nut as well as kernel weight and kernel ratio of superior walnut genotypes were 11-12 g, 6-7 g and more than 45%, respectively. As per Ebrahimi et al (2011), the nut weight varied from 7.52 to 17.73 g, kernel weight from 4.00 to 9.83 g, and kernel percentage ratio from 38.78 to 67.05% amongst calculated genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The highest value for nut weight among our evaluated trees (15.2 g) was less than the corresponding data reported by Sen & Tekintas (1992) for Adilcevaz, Turkey (23.81 g); Atefi (1997) for Kamal Abad walnut collection orchard, Iran (20.9 g); Sharma & Sharma (1998) Sen & Tekintas (1992), Atefi (1997), Kazankaya et al (2001), Sharma & Sharma (2001), Yarilgac et al (2001), Acka & ozungun (2004), Zeneli et al (2004), and Aslantas (2006). In breeding programmes, genotypes with a kernel ratio higher than 48-50% are more desirable (Germain 1997;Korac et al 1997).…”
Section: Phenological and Flowering Traitscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Walnut genotype evaluation has previously been conducted in many countries throughout the world (Sen & Tekintas 1992;Nicese et al 1998;Sharma & Sharma 1998,2001Kazankaya et al 2001;Yarilgac et al 2001;Solar & Stampar 2003;Acka & ozungun 2004;Asadian & Pieber 2005;Zenli et al 2005). In Iran, the first extensive studies were initiated by Atefi in 1984(Atefi 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pomological parameters of ripe fruits from different regions of Van Lake did not show significant (P>0.05) difference (except nut length). Pomologic properties of samples tested in this study showed good correlation with data previously reported for the walnut genotypes grown in Turkey (15,18).…”
Section: Fruit Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Pomological properties such as nut weight, kernel weight, kernel ratio, nut length, suture, diameter, shell thickness, shell roughness (easy, medium, hard), kernel colour (light, tawny, dark) and shell colour (light, tawny, dark) were determined in five matured walnut genotypes from each region (15).…”
Section: Fruit Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%